User talk:Donaldecoho

Welcome

B-class review

Re: [1] - please make sure to list it at the WP:MILHIST B-class review section too, they have many more reviewers. FYI, if I were to review it I'd fail it: there are too many unreferenced paragraphs.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All photographs have been vetted by licensing protocols at Wiki Commons, but by context, I infer that 'unreferenced' means that something additional is required. Would transfer of the source and licensing info from Commons to a citation in the hosting article make them 'referenced'? Or does 'referencing' mean something else?--Donaldecoho (talk) 13:11, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Placement of photo in Friend to Friend masonic memorial. wikipedia article.

Hi Donald,

A couple years ago, I added a number of clear photos to the article and after a short period of time, they were removed from the article citing information I received at the address listed.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Friend_to_Friend_Masonic_Memorial

It went into detail as follows:

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Friend to Friend Masonic Memorial

   File:Friend to friend full front.jpg
   File:Friendtofriendmasonicmemorial.JPG
   File:Gettysburg Mason Memorial.jpg

These are most of the images in Category:Friend to Friend Masonic Memorial, all in use at en:Friend to Friend Masonic Memorial. According to that article, this memorial was completed in 1993 by the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania, which appears to be a private organisation. No reason to believe it's public domain, and there is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in the United States, so these photographs are derivative works of a non-free sculpture. I am not nominating the plaque because as a document it appears to consist almost entirely of proper names with little creative expression. --Dcoetzee (talk) 05:51, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Giving you a heads-up in case someone removes it.

--Allamericanbear (talk) 19:34, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Antietam0900 125PA 34NY 07MI.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:03, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gettysburg Address Featured article review

I have nominated Gettysburg Address for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:10, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]