User talk:DoubleGrazing

Welcome to my talk page!

Hello! Please leave a new message. I will respond to your message as soon as possible. Thanks and happy editing!

Also take care of the following points:

If I left you a message; please answer on your talk page, using {{ping|Username}}, {{reply to|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in your response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to my talk page. And if you leave me a message; I will answer on my talk page, using {{ping|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in my response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to your talk page.
Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page or at the bottom of the respective section, and use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics.
Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ":"
Sign and date your entry by inserting four tildes "~~~~" at the end of your message.
I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.
Avoid personal attacks, do not troll or use this page as a chat room.
Please, always assume good faith.
If the topic is something personal, please email me and leave {{ygm}} on my talk page.
And if you are impressed by my contributions, consider giving me some WikiLove.

⇒Start a new topic⇐

This user is a regular and doesn't mind if you template them.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52

Scam warning!

There is a scam underway, targeting editors who attempt to publish Wikipedia article(s); see WP:SCAM for more information. If you have been approached by someone offering to create, accept or otherwise help publish an article in exchange for a payment, please e-mail the details to paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org. This may help others in a similar situation to avoid becoming victims of this vile scam.
PS: If that someone claims to be me, they emphatically are not!

If I declined your draft at AfC, and you came to ask me to re-review it, please don't (unless I expressly said you could) – I feel it's fairer to the other drafts that yours goes back to the pool... and probably also fairer to your draft that someone else reviews it next. (And if you just came to tell me you've made changes, that's great, but no need to inform me.)

If you still want to leave me a message about a draft or article, I'd appreciate if you could please link to the page in question, so I don't have to go hunting for it. Ta.

Changes made to the Draft

Hello @[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing], Thank you for your comments on my submitted Draft: Ar. Jayesh Hariyani. I have worked on the changes you suggested. Kindly, review them and let me know if there is anything else I need to work on. Appreciate your time. Melalekhan24 (talk) 17:27, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete this

This article is informative. Asrafdiu123 (talk) 11:49, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Asrafdiu123: you have now twice resubmitted Draft:Nasima Kadir Molla High School and Homes without any attempt at addressing the decline reasons. This is not only completely pointless, but it is also discourteous and annoying. You only have a finite number of attempts to get your draft published, I suggest you don't waste them with frivolous resubmissions. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:46, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I reedit this article. It is a notable school located in Bangladesh. It is a top school not only Bangladesh but also south asia. There is many articla like this. So for helping people to know about details about this school it is mendatory to publish this school. Asrafdiu123 (talk) 12:49, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Submission denied " Vettakkorumakankavu temple"

Need your help/advice on the rejection based on Wikipedia sources that you have mentioned. What other type of sources are needed? This is an ancient temple in a village of a large town of more than 700 years. Hunsur (talk) 08:13, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Everything you say in the draft needs to be supported by reliable published sources, so that the information can be verified. In fact, everything needs to be based on reliable published sources, and your job as the editor is merely to summarise what such sources have previously said.

The sources must also show that the subject is notable enough to be included in a global encyclopaedia in the first place. If this building is included in an official heritage register or similar listing, then per WP:GEOFEAT that could make it notable; we would still need to see evidence of that status. Otherwise it needs to satisfy the general notability guideline WP:GNG, which requires significant coverage in multiple secondary sources that are reliable and entirely independent of the subject. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:20, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ping @Hunsur -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:20, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

new profile adding issue

please help me to what kind of errors here in my article ?

link: Draft:KP Khalid Alax Varghese (talk) 11:02, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what i do 117.231.196.21 (talk) 09:50, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is this regarding? Are you also asking about the Draft:KP Khalid draft?

The decline reasons are shown in the decline notice on top of the draft, those are the issues that you need to address. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:10, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ZP10MIC

Hi I am Paul and you recently reviewed my article which was declined for copyright reasons.

The duplicate copy was from my personal blog which was written by myself but has now been removed.

Could you please allow me to resubmit the wikipedia article?

All the Best

Paul ZP10MIC (talk) 11:00, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @ZP10MIC,

I'm not a copyright expert, so don't take this as gospel, but all the same here's how I understand the situation:

Speedy deletion was requested on your sandbox draft, and at the time I attended to the request, I checked and saw that the content was the same as on the gardenscapes84.com website, which claims copyright. I had therefore no option but to execute the requested speedy deletion.

If that website no longer hosts the said content, then this wouldn't possibly now get picked up as a copyright violation. However, it still is one, because once the copyright claim is made, it persists even after the content is removed from a public website. Therefore, I couldn't knowingly let you post the same material here again.

I also only have your word that you are the copyright owner of this material. I'm not doubting that, but I also cannot verify the claim, and therefore wouldn't be able to accept your request on that basis alone.

You may be able to 'donate' the copyright material to Wikipedia, which is probably your best, and possibly only, way forward. For info on this, see donating copyrighted materials.

HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:12, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ZP10MIC (talk page watcher) I think I was the reviewer who noted the copyvio. I commend the suggestion of donating the text, but with a serious caveat. Writing for a blog and wi=ring for Wikipedia are different things, thus your blog text, were it to be reinstated and donated, may be totally unsuitable for Wikipedia. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 20:16, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind taking a look, please

A disappointed creating editor objects to my decline, and has said ^{[need quotation to verify]} on my talk page. I do not believe it was a poor decline, but, if it was then I will take it on the chin. I do mind about the incivility, however, and wonder if you might indicate that this behaviour is not appropriate. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 20:06, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]