User talk:Dwalin
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Dwalin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Ysangkok (talk) 21:14, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry sorry sorry, wrong warning (just deleted it). DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 13:14, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Nuclear power in the United States
[edit]I note your revert here and wonder what you mean by "only one plant for IAEA". Johnfos (talk) 00:22, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Jaitapur
[edit]Hey Dwalin, Thank you for your attention with the Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project Links. I try to talk with user Sachinvenga about this links. Best regards ChNPP (talk) 14:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
December 2010
[edit]You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pontificalibus (talk) 15:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. * All the information is cited and Unbiased, if you think anything wrong you can discuss on talk page. Just don’t delete without discussion. . Shlok talk . 15:13, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
red book IAEA
[edit]Message added 12:03, 19 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
nuclear in belgium
[edit]Message added 15:34, 31 December 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Thanks
[edit]Hi Dwalin, your 'thanks' on my reversion of your edit a very gracious response. Cheers. Oska (talk) 02:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Starlink revert
[edit]Hi! I re-reverted! your revert and in the explanation I wrote that "the word "working" means that the satellite behaves as expected and is not out of control, whether it has started broadcasting the Internet to users or not (functional)." Maybe a better word can be used instead of "working".Meysam5670 (talk) 20:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)