Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taabii was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Imran (film editor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Editorimrans!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Taabii (talk) 14:29, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Taabii,
Thank you for your feedback on my submission. I completely understand the notability guidelines and the importance of having reliable, independent references.
I’d like to provide some context: While I am a debut film editor, my work is gradually gaining visibility, with mentions on platforms like Filmibeat, Cinema Express, and Twitter, especially surrounding the release of my film’s first look. However, I have noticed that some of these mentions are incorrect, especially in terms of how my name is spelled or presented.
As my career continues to grow, I am confident that more coverage will follow, and I’m actively working on ensuring that these platforms get the details right. I’ll also be gathering new, reliable sources to strengthen the article before resubmitting.
That said, I would like to ask if there are any alternative ways I can work on getting my Wikipedia article approved or improve the visibility of my profile. I'm not familiar with other platforms or contacts that might be helpful in this process.
I appreciate your understanding, and I’m committed to improving my submission with accurate references.
Thank you for your feedback on my submission. I completely understand the notability guidelines and the importance of having reliable, independent references.
I’d like to provide some context: While I am a debut film editor, my work is gradually gaining visibility, with mentions on platforms like Filmibeat, Cinema Express, and Twitter, especially surrounding the release of my film’s first look. However, I have noticed that some of these mentions are incorrect, especially in terms of how my name is spelled or presented.
As my career continues to grow, I am confident that more coverage will follow, and I’m actively working on ensuring that these platforms get the details right. I’ll also be gathering new, reliable sources to strengthen the article before resubmitting.
That said, I would like to ask if there are any alternative ways I can work on getting my Wikipedia article approved or improve the visibility of my profile. I'm not familiar with other platforms or contacts that might be helpful in this process.
I appreciate your understanding, and I’m committed to improving my submission with accurate references.
