User talk:Ek7777

Welcome!

Hello, Ek7777, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Business tax return, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 21:47, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Business tax return

A tag has been placed on Business tax return requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 21:47, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Business tax return. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. For the record, copyvio is just the first problem with this. Wikipedia is not a how to guide, which makes the page inappropriate even if the copyright issues were resolved. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 22:21, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Im not sure that viewing a simplfied view of tax forms as a "how to guide" is an accurate assesment; the point made is that the info included in the site, which by the way is a glaring omission from wiki at this time, is not to be taken as a full explanation of all that one needs to know about these forms. You seem to have some problem with the info i added, but here's my point of view: its content that I wrote, word by word, so it's clearly not a copyright issue. The fact that I added the same content to my own site does not make it one. And without these tax forms explained in general basic terms on Wiki, I contributed something that either wasn't already there or wasn't easy to find-thats why i wrote it, for the record. I had to do my research elsewhere after trying wikipedia first. I had removed your statement of "copyright" error because i knew it wasn't one. And the fact that im ensuring the reader doesn't assume they know all they need to about the basic tax forms by adding the details that you refer to as "how-to" is just an effort to be socially responsible; not everyone will read an informative document such as this one and realize that it's just a brief overview of the basics. If you feel the need to delete the page still, i'm not going to contest it, but it seems to be a silly decision considering a basic review of applicable tax forms is missing from a site of this magnitude. Best, EK Ek7777 (talk) 04:54, 28 January 2010 (UTC)ek7777[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Whypark

A tag has been placed on Whypark requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 04:33, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:04, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]