User talk:Firnanda.Reena

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Arenza Thigpen Jr.

Hello Firnanda.Reena, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Arenza Thigpen Jr., should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arenza Thigpen Jr. (2nd nomination).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Veronica Cintron for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Veronica Cintron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veronica Cintron until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:12, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reena Ninan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC News. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:23, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know. Firnanda.Reena (talk) 17:39, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reena Ninan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC News.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Walk-off touchdown moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Walk-off touchdown. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 21:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walk-off touchdown (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Some of the examples listed happen at the end of regulation. If desired, this can be a section at the walk-off page or Sudden death (sport)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Walk-off touchdown and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:31, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AngusWOOF May I please may the article to build on Firnanda.Reena (talk) 00:16, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Firnanda.Reena! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:31, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gauge (firearms)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauge_(firearms)

Dear Firnanda.Reena.

If I got it right, you are the original creator of the big list of the Gauge definition. It look like is grow future and right now it is very difficult to read, I would like to restructure the chapter Gauge Calculation because the to day standard of Gauge is very different.

See in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gauge_(firearms) Size of a Gauge.

I suppose it had maid a lot of work to build the list but are relay more than 100 entry's are need ?

I would use the most common Gauge today in the table and show also that a gauge is not only a diameter in the definition today. I like also to show that there are several valid definition for the same Gauge.

Are you OK if I change the Table like I show it in the talk ?

Regards

Eliot Eliot128 (talk) 20:09, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Eliot128 do what you want. no objections Firnanda.Reena (talk) 20:17, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot Eliot128 (talk) 23:47, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]