User talk:FrancioFr87

February 2025

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Technopat (talk) 20:42, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Reply

Thank you for your message.The template I left you above clearly sets out what's going on here. It also clearly states, among other key pieces of advice: "To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors."

I have nothing further to add, at least for the moment, except to remind you, in case you have not yet read the above template, of how to proceed from now on and of the consequences of edit-warring. Technopat (talk) 20:52, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Misunderstanding

Thank you for the reply. Anyway I am not doing an edit war. In this scenario, you would be the one that started this. You reverted my contribution without an explanation. Also, you didn't answer my question. FrancioFr87 (talk) 20:58, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. Please don't get into the cycle of who started what, basically because it's a waste of everyone's time. The facts are simple: you changed, rightly or wrongly, the status quo, without explaining why (no edit summary). As I have already pointed out above, the place to resolve this is on the [article] talk page, where other users, more or less knowledgeable than you or I, can reach a consensus regarding your proposed changes.--Technopat (talk) 21:16, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Misunderstanding

I'll explain you why. I think it is indisputable that the cheese mentioned in the article is the one produced in Italy, consequently, the correct name is Parmigiano Reggiano. It should also be remembered that Parmesan and Parmigiano Reggiano, as also stated on the article's discussion page, are two different things. Parmigiano Reggiano is Parmesan, while Parmesan is not always Parmigiano Reggiano. As someone suggested in the discussion page, there should be two distinct pages. One for Parmesan and one for Parmigiano Reggiano. Furthermore, having reached the status quo does not mean that what has been decided is right. That said, I will probably open a discussion on the issue in the next few days and maybe edit the article again obviously adding the summary as you advised. I kindly ask you not to take action in this case. Thank you. FrancioFr87 (talk) 21:43, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. This is now getting boring. As I have pointed out now, on more that one occasion, the place to resolve this issue is not my talk page nor your talk page. As for "kindly" asking me not to take further action in this case, that depends entirely on your future actions. --Technopat (talk) 21:54, 21 February 2025 (UTC)