User talk:FutureBuilder14
Welcome!
[edit]Hi FutureBuilder14! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Jay8g [V•T•E] 01:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
New message to FutureBuilder14
[edit]In general, there is no need either to add additional citations to material that is already adequately cited. Also, article leads are generally meant to be summaries of cited material in the body, and thus generally don't require their own inline citations. Remsense ‥ 论 00:20, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
A lot of the unnecessary refs this account added in the last few days are papers published in the Encyclopedia of Sexual Psychology and Behavior, which is apparently a book that will be published in 2025 (though some websites say it was published in 2023). The other book that is often cited is the International Encyclopedia of Human Sexuality. Badbluebus (talk) 00:54, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- @FutureBuilder14: Warning Please be aware that adding links to promote something is regarded as spam. You will be blocked if it continues. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 01:12, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Johnuniq I'm not paid by anyone, I'm just adding scientific and reliable sources FutureBuilder14 (talk) 16:03, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
February 2025
[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at ChatGPT, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Theroadislong (talk) 16:15, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Theroadislong I'm not paid by anyone, I'm just adding scientific and reliable sources! FutureBuilder14 (talk) 16:05, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Cyber-utopianism. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 16:09, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- I have blocked you for mass reverting another editor without explanation. PhilKnight (talk) 16:44, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- @PhilKnight Wikipedia is becoming toxic and ruled by small circle of arrogant editors like you. I wish you a miserable life. FutureBuilder14 (talk) 17:06, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- Due to your harassing personal attack above, I have revoked your talk page access. Read WP:UTRS for your unblock options. Cullen328 (talk) 21:00, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- @PhilKnight Wikipedia is becoming toxic and ruled by small circle of arrogant editors like you. I wish you a miserable life. FutureBuilder14 (talk) 17:06, 12 February 2025 (UTC)