User talk:GNG22

Hi, this is my talk page. I'm sure CU's AGTF this one.

June 2025

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at LaToya Ruby Frazier, you may be blocked from editing. ... discospinster _talk 16:30, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize about this edit. But I've found a source for it. Can I add it back? GNG22 (talk) 16:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like you have reverted a few of my edits. Most of them are...yes..unsourced. But they are valid. GNG22 (talk) 16:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 16:38, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GNG22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im sorry for adding bad edits to Wikipedia. I would like to take full responsibility for these edits and they will not happen again. Again, I apologize if I have made you angry or frustrated in any way. I'm just a new user editing Wikipedia. Please be nice to me. Best, GNG22 (talk) 16:40, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request and the comment after it suggest that you do not actually know why you are blocked or that you know what Wikipedia's standards are for content and contributions. DMacks (talk) 17:41, 7 June 2025

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I hope you consider unblocking me as I am a valued contributor here. GNG22 (talk) 16:46, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GNG22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It looks like my block got deleted. So I am going to reissue the unblock request again. I would like to be unblocked because I feel like I am a trusted Wikipedia and after some time thinking about the bad faith edits that I have done, I have concluded that they were wrong. I don't think I should be indefinitely blocked here. I try the best way possibe to make good edits. I think the one disrupting Wikipedia is you guys because you're blocking editors who have done a good job editing this site and making good contributions and adding references and supportive details. I hope that you considered not removing my block nor not paying any attention to it, because it shows that you don't care about new users on this site. Per WP:NEWBIE I don't think I should be treated this way at all. Onorem (talk) 17:56, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on your rant below, I have revoked talk page access. PhilKnight (talk) 18:28, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

:I'm not sure where my un-block request is. I don't see it on here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GNG22 (talk • contribs) 17:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Redacted)

I tried to fix the formatting and it got screwed up by an edit conflict because you were also posting. Sorry. Now that you've continued to post, it's just that much more difficult to figure out how to fix it. --Onorem (talk) 18:16, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mhm, sure you did. Either that or YOU were on your lunch break (unless if you're not an admin). GNG22 (talk) 18:18, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Redacted)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

PhilKnight (talk) 18:28, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]