User talk:GRAYSSSSSS

This is GRAYSSSSSS's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tendancy (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As the band doesn't have an article, and the album hasn't charted anywhere, this isn't close to the expected standard of notability I'm afraid. Come back when the album is in a main stream chart or has critical commentary in reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tendancy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarcGarver (talk) 14:18, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GRAYSSSSSS! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MarcGarver (talk) 14:18, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Loudhouse have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Loudhouse was changed by GRAYSSSSSS (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2025-05-06T14:46:55+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:46, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 06:19, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JSFarman. An edit that you recently made to 8 Degrees seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. All three of the articles you created were generated using AI. The references do not support the content of the article, nor do they establish notability. JSFarman (talk) 15:40, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Swam the Waters

Hello GRAYSSSSSS,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Swam the Waters for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JSFarman (talk) 00:15, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Swam the Waters

Hello GRAYSSSSSS, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Swam the Waters, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swam the Waters.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|JSFarman}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JSFarman (talk) 00:21, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

8 Degrees

Hi, the article was written with ChatGPT and the sources added don't confirm anything that was written. FMSky (talk) 06:38, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In one of the cases, a link you added was even https://www.discogs.com/artist/3884631-8-Degrees?utm_source=chatgpt.com lmfao --FMSky (talk) 06:47, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

8 Degrees moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 8 Degrees, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 09:08, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Series of Moments moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, A Series of Moments, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 09:17, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:A Series of Moments has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:A Series of Moments. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 09:19, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]