User talk:Globallycz

Welcome!

Hello, Globallycz!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Thewikizoomer (talk) 09:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Armand Duplantis

I have asked an administrator to review your conduct in continually reverting the page ahead of consensus being achieved on the Talk page Billsmith60 (talk) 17:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 17:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I dont think I was the first one who claimed GOAT status for Mondo. There wasn’t any discussion when changes were made by those who disagreed. And this is the same for your approach to removing the diamond lrague title. It has been there for a long time even before I started my first edit and uou had it removed without discussion too. I am not trying to accuse anyone..jist stating facts and defending myself. Globallycz (talk) 17:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add. Being new when I first started, I was not fully aware there is this channel for discussion at Talk. But when I become aware, I have tried to engage in discussion but there is no acceptance or acknowledgement to what I put forth. Even when I told you that almost all diamond league winners have listed DL title in their wikipedia pages, there is zero acknowledgement. Globallycz (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Faith

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Talk:Armand Duplantis. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! Brocade River Poems (She/They) 04:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I do not agree. You have to review the entire issue in perspective and not just conversation at Talk:Armand Duplantis. I do not wish to explain further until you are aware of the entire series of exchange. Globallycz (talk) 09:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm Synorem. I noticed that in this edit to Armand Duplantis, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Synorem (talk) 18:22, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am relatively new. The removal was accidental when I tried to add content regarding origin of nickname for Duplantis. Thanks for restoring almost all the deleted content. Globallycz (talk) 19:16, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Globallycz! Your additions to World Athletics Awards have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Diannaa (talk) 20:35, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you throwing so much rules at me? I am just trying to contribute to the wikipedia page to keep it updated. Did anyone raise an issue other than yourself? Sorry i am afraid I will disregard your inputs. Too much details. You are like lecturing others.

If this us your way, nobody will want to conteibute anymore. Globallycz (talk) 17:13, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]