User talk:Hannah Levin

November 2022

Hello, I'm Roundish. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nina Ansary without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Additionally, do not mark such edits as minor. Only mark edits as minor if they are simple grammar and typo fixes and the like. Roundish ⋆t c) 17:40, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nina Ansary bio additions

Hi Hannah. Thank you for including something on the Ennia case involving Nina Ansary. However, there is one part of your text that is not in line with the interim verdict.

The text you inserted states that:

'Although this is an interim judgment, in it the Common Court of Justice has already indicated that by final judgment (which is still to be rendered) it will overturn all orders against Nina Ansary based on her alleged insufficient supervision of Ennia. In the same interlocutory judgment, the Common Court of Justice indicated that by final judgment it will however (partially) uphold the orders of the Court in First Instance rendered against the other defendants. The Common Court of Justice has indicated that it needs to have clarity about the value of Mullet Bay, an important asset of Ennia, in order to give a final judgment, to which end it will appoint a real estate valuator.'

This is a misrepresentation of the verdict. While what you state above is true for the S&S and Oil Rigs matters (as in 13.2 of the interim verdict), it is not true in the Mullet Bay matter (see 13.3). In the Mullet Bay matter, the court states that on the grounds for compensation of damages, Parman International respectively Nina Ansary is not liable, but both can still be liable on the grounds of unjustified payments or unjustified enrichment. The latter depends on the value of Mullet Bay, which is exactly what still needs to be agreed upon. In October 2023, parties are supposed to appoint an independent appraiser that will appraise Mullet Bay. Hence, this matter is not settled at all.

In light of the requirements under the neutral point of view, the current text is not appropriate, as it is not balanced in line with the interim verdict and paints Nina Ansary in a more positive light than warranted. I am happy to discuss the matter.

interim verdict: https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/#!/details?id=ECLI:NL:OGHACMB:2023:158&showbutton=true&keyword=ennia&idx=8 2A02:A45B:F1AB:1:65BF:C826:49DE:E907 (talk) 09:01, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear anonymous contributor, I have studied the full judgement and it is incorrect that, with respect to the Mullet Bay/dividend claim, Nina Ansary "can still be held liable on the grounds of unjustified payments or unjustified enrichment," as you state. The court has indicated that Nina Ansary is not liable with respect to all claims. You fail to acknowledge that a claim based on someone's liability is something different than a claim based on unjustified enrichment or undue payment. Those claims will be overturned with respect to Nina Ansary. The claim for payment based on unjustified enrichment and undue payment is Ennia's alternative. Regarding the Mullet Bay/dividend matter, the court ruled that more information (in particular with regard to the value of Mullet Bay) is needed in order to assess the alternative claim against Parman based on undue payment and, by extension, the claim against Parman's shareholders based on unjustified enrichment. In order to clarify this I have nevertheless amended the paragraph "Ennia Case." Everything written in the paragraph "Ennia Case" is factually correct. I suggest that, following the latest amendment, we now close the discussion. Kind regards, Hannah Hannah Levin (talk) 04:17, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Nina Ansary Photo Update.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nina Ansary Photo Update.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]