User talk:Harper70

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Harper70/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 23:44, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Harper70, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 23:44, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing disclosure

According to Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure, you must disclose your paid editing as a SAP employee. I appreciate that you have already done this. The preferred way is to add this to your User:Harper70 page: {{paid|employer=SAP}} (see: Template:Paid). It's to keep disclosures explicit, uniform, and transparent. I'd appreciate if you added this to your user page in addition to the statement you have written. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 21:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SAP SE

I have not been actively seeking any feedback.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:28, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Any words you would have to define that sound like "marketing speak" should be removed. I don't know what "re-implementing" would be but the last sentence should be fine other than that. Just try to say everything in a neutral way.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:13, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just say customers can upgrade. That's easy enough to understand.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can't take down the orange banner because I'm not sure everyone would agree. But I removed some promotional content that people might object to.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]