User talk:Hobbitina
Index
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Women in Red December 2024
[edit]Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 18:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red January 2025
[edit] Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 17:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Samantha
[edit]Gnerally, interviews are not accepted references. Definitely for not what the person says about themselves. Some interviews have introduction sections composed by the interviewer; usually any facts there can be referenced. David notMD (talk) 18:04, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the answer! I've looked at the Wikipedia:Interviews page closer too and what you said completely explains the secondary source value of interviews. Using them as a primary source for the subject's opinions about themselves makes sense in certain situations so I think I mostly need to spend more time reading up on what's acceptable for citing self-published information in practice. Hobbitina (talk) 02:29, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hello Hobbitina! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
2025 Update from Women in Green
[edit]Hello Hobbitina:
2024 has wrapped up, and what a full year it was for WikiProject Women in Green! Over the past year, we hosted two edit-a-thons, one themed around women's history and another on women around the world. We also managed to achieve most of our 2024 annual goals, nominating 75 articles for GA, reviewing 64 GA nominations, nominating 8 articles for FAC, peer reviewing 3 articles and reviewing 10 FAC nominations. Excellent work, and thank you to everyone involved!
For 2025 we have a new set of goals for nominations and reviews. In particular, we would like to see more articles on our Hot 100 list being improved and nominated for GA this year. If you take a look at the list and see an article you are interested in contributing to, feel free to add it and yourself to our Hot 100 project discussion. You might even find someone interested in collaborating with you!
This year, as with every year, we hope you will join us in helping improve our coverage of women and women's works on this encyclopedia. Every contribution helps. We'll see you around!
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2025
[edit]Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331
Announcements from other communities:
Tip of the month:
Suggestion:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging