User talk:Imzadi1979
Appearance
Welcome to the talk page of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e873c/e873c17bc3210793dfe99312ce55b5409fbc57ca" alt=""
Imzadi1979
If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page.
Please start a new talk page thread either by clicking the New section link above or using the box below. This will make sure that the edit summary that appears on watchlists accurately shows your edit as a new topic, and not related to another topic. Thank you.
"Imzadi1979 (public)" is an alternate account for use on public computers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9e57/a9e57568372c8f53b002e6d7bfc5e1df00268945" alt=""
Imzadi1979
If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page.
Please start a new talk page thread either by clicking the New section link above or using the box below. This will make sure that the edit summary that appears on watchlists accurately shows your edit as a new topic, and not related to another topic. Thank you.
Need Your Help
[edit]What other improvements need at Draft:U.S. Route 78 in Tennessee to be approved? Same with Draft:U.S. Route 78 in Mississippi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.93.6.52 (talk) 19:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- The Tennessee draft has no content. It's an infobox and a single sentence, and that's not enough. It should have a few basic paragraphs. The prose can be expanded later, so at least a paragraph someplace on the route and some basic history.
- The Mississippi draft has content, so it's in much better shape. I'd already left some general comments at Draft talk:U.S. Route 78 in Mississippi#Links. Please note, the history section content that's there needs to be trimmed down, and then additional content should be added to cover something from the last 99 years of the highway's history.
- In general, there should be a handful of unique footnotes added to each draft before either can be approved. Imzadi 1979 → 19:46, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- More improved have been added in Draft:U.S. Route 78 in Tennessee. What else needs to be fixed? @Imzadi1979 158.93.6.52 (talk) 17:37, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hey, I worked hard on filling the content on Draft:U.S. Route 78 in Tennessee. How do I get it approved? Can you help? Every ip is not filling these drafts anymore, so I don’t want them abandoned. 69.1.59.248 (talk) 07:42, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Also same with Draft:U.S. Route 78 in Mississippi article by the way. Don’t want these drafts to be deleted after 6 months. 69.1.59.248 (talk) 08:07, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
US 78 Tennessee Article Completed
[edit]The article is ready for approval (Draft:U.S. Route 78 in Tennessee). 69.1.59.248 (talk) 02:32, 23 February 2025 (UTC)