User talk:Jcmps

This is Jcmps's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mental Fitness (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jlwoodwa was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mental Fitness and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jlwoodwa (talk) 01:29, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's no surprise that I am new to this. And I did use Gemini to (1) find highest quality sources based on an outline I created (to broaden my sources) and (2) touch up some of the language used to make it more wikipedia-like (since I'm a 2ndary language speaker).

It seems it failed me in many ways.

I wasn't deterred. So let me ask you a few questions that would help me editing this better.

1. Does the general outline sound good to you, or is it not appropriate in some ways? History, Theoretical Foundations, Core Principles and Practices, Economics Impact and Adoption, Critiques and Limitations.

2. Originally Gemini found about 100 sources, 20 of them I already have. And I filter the rest to get to about 50 that are high-quality or straightforward summary of others. Was any of them need to be get rid off?

3. As I begin to double check the sources, rewrite and resubmit, was there any section that you feel is the biggest misses to you? What are the most urgent ones that I should start with? Or was it just the general vibe that this was touched by Gemini?

Thank you. Jcmps (talk) 20:09, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jcmps! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! jlwoodwa (talk) 01:29, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]