User talk:Jidon34

March 2024

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sahir Ali Bagga discography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 16:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Nauman335 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nauman335. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 23:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jidon34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Just woke up and saw the blocking notification from the User:Izno as per the reason of the Sockpuppet account of User:Nauman335. I didn't understand why I'm blocked because I do not belong to any other account or I'm a Sockpuppet. On the Investigation Page, i see that the reason for my Socking or Blocking by the User:CNMall41 is that i have made 3 edits on List of programs broadcast by Hum TV, Jawed Sheikh and Khaie, which was also edited by the blocked User:Nauman335, in Past 4 months ago. Do you think that this is the strong reason for blocking me. The same interest in these Pages can be a coincidence. More, as i noticed that blocked account and my account contributions are quietly more difference. I made more than 500 edits and I'm not involved in any edit war or edit conflict, nor any make edit which was Lack of interest or not Notable. I request to unblock me because I'm not involved in any Sockpuppet account which causes the blocking of my account as the reasons I provide above. Thank you very muchJidon34 (talk)

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Unambiguous. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 01:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Jidon34 (talk) 00:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re:undo request for deletion

Rafta Rafta (TV series) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rafta Rafta (TV series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ravensfire (talk) 00:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2024 Pakistani television series debuts

A tag has been placed on Category:2024 Pakistani television series debuts indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jidon34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Wikipedia Administrators. I hope you enjoy your day. I'm making another unblock request because I'm not involved in the Sockpuppet Account Case. This is my Only original account and I do not belong to any other accounts, I made more than 500 edits and I really enjoyed and worked hard to make These edits. I was really disappointed and hearted 😭 my hard work got blocked in seconds. I think i was blocked due to some misunderstanding of just the same IP address or the IP address resembling the blocked sockpuppet of User:Nauman335. My IP address is 192.168.1.8 and you can match this to the Block account. I request you to Unblock me because I'm not involved in any Sockpuppet investigation of the user Nauman335. Thank you Have a good day....❤️

Decline reason:

That is not your Internet address. Confirmed sockpuppetry, as unambiguous a case as I've ever seen. Yamla (talk) 15:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reply

@Yamla

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jidon34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what should i have to do. By God I'm not a Sock user. Believe me. This is totally unfair. Jidon34 (talk) 16:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

TPA removed, closing. 331dot (talk) 09:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There's nothing to be done. Neither the blocking administrator nor I believe you. --Yamla (talk) 16:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TPA removed. All Naumann etc. socks should pre-emptively have TPA removed. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]