Jump to content

User talk:John Cummings

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Minimum Speciesbox parameters for full functionality

[edit]

Hi, when you create a {{Speciesbox}}, as at Glossina haningtoni (which I've fixed), you need to complete either |taxon= or |genus=+|species= (not both). Although by default, the WP:Automated taxobox system picks up the taxon name from the page name, it doesn't have full functionality, e.g. the page title isn't italicized. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:02, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peter coxhead, thank you very much for explaining it, I thought leaving it blank autocompleted it correctly, I'll go back over the articles I've created and add in the correct bits for genus + species. Thanks again, John Cummings (talk) 17:22, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again Peter coxhead, looks like you fixed them all already, thanks so much :) John Cummings (talk) 17:58, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Glossina fusca has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Diannaa (talk) 22:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In case it isn't clear, the problem with the source you used (which would anyway need to be cited) is that on p. ii it gives the copyright as "CC BY-NC-SA 3.0", but Wikipedia doesn't allow "NC" material to be used.
Tsetse flies are clearly important and should be covered here. You need to paraphrase (but not closely) and cite. My experience is that in species descriptions it's hard to avoid quite close paraphrasing because there is a standard terminology that biologists use, but it can be avoided in other areas. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:52, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I expanded Glossina fusca a bit, hopefully to show how it can be done. I don't intend to do any more – tsetse flies are not an interest of mine! Peter coxhead (talk) 11:09, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Diannaa and Peter coxhead, I deeply appreciate your help with this. I've been working with an expert on the topic to create these new articles and it seems the rephrasing got missed with this particular article. Thank you for your work in fixing this issue, I've rephrased the info about the subspecies. John Cummings (talk) 11:49, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for doing that. And sorry for the earlier templated message; the high volume of reports at CopyPatrol right now precludes the use of more personalized messages. Diannaa (talk) 12:00, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Diannaa no worries :) John Cummings (talk) 12:10, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There are two ways you could handle referencing to The continental atlas of the distribution of tsetse flies in Africa in the Glossina fusca article. One is to just use a single named reference to the whole work, with the page indication given as "pp. 50, 58–59". (You need p. 50 because that's where the authorities for the subspecies are.) The other, which I prefer, and I think is more helpful to readers when different page ranges are used for different information, is to put the work in the Bibliography section, and then use {{sfnp|Cecchi|Paone|de Gier|Zhao|2024|p=...}} or {{sfnp|Cecchi|Paone|de Gier|Zhao|2024|pp=...}} for each page/pages you have used. But which you use is up to you, but please always include the pages. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:40, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM: January 2025

[edit]




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Women in Red March 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | March 2025, Vol 11, Issue 3, Nos. 326, 327, 332, 333, 334


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • You can access the Wikipedia Library if you have made 500+ edits, and 6+ months editing,
    and 10+ edits in the last 30 days, and No active blocks

Moving the needle:[1]

  • 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women)
  • 23 Dec 2024: 20.009% (2,041,741 bios, 408,531 women)

Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period!

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:54, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

  1. ^ "Humaniki".