User talk:JuxtaposedJacob
Hey besties
[edit]Welcome to my talk page!
The Wretched Life of Juanita Narboni
[edit]Thank you for your edits on The Wretched Life of Juanita Narboni. I apologize for imprudently reverted your changes without an edit summary. I have tweaked the article a bit, again forgetting to add an edit summary.
The citations were certainly overkill, but I don't believe all but one is necessary. I agree with the fact that the synopsis was way too short and vague. Feel free to take a look at my revision and make any changes you deem necessary. Cheers! Moonswimmer Mooonswimmer
Charlotte Jacquot moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Charlotte Jacquot, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Pbrks (t • c) 04:19, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 30
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scarface (1983 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scarface. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
May 2022
[edit]Hi JuxtaposedJacob! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 09:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
[edit]Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Joshua Project has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 10:33, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Joshua Project, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You changed "people groups" to "people" which contradicts the source and was misleading as it underplayed the number Doug Weller talk 10:34, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi there,
- I read the source from the sentence to glean what a "people group" was, as I'd never heard that phrasing before, and I tried to make it less confusing with my edit. I wasn't aware there was a distinction and was assuming it was a poor translation.
- Sorry about my mistake with the edit summary!
- JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 14:54, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- No problem. I think it's their terminology.[1]. Hm, that could be added if you want. Doug Weller talk 16:34, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- No, it's not their phrase, they cite something for it. Doug Weller talk 16:35, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller
- I changed Joshua project to cite their information about people groups. I didn't use the source that they cited because I thought their webpage was more relevant to our article. If you ould tell me your thoughts, that would be great. Thanks and have a nice day! JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 14:47, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Seems ok. Doug Weller talk 15:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. Doug Weller talk 15:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Seems ok. Doug Weller talk 15:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- No, it's not their phrase, they cite something for it. Doug Weller talk 16:35, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- No problem. I think it's their terminology.[1]. Hm, that could be added if you want. Doug Weller talk 16:34, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Charlotte Jacquot
[edit]Hello, JuxtaposedJacob. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charlotte Jacquot, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
May 2023
[edit]Hello, I'm JML1148. I noticed that you made a change to an article, In-car entertainment, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 07:25, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, as noted in my edit summary, I simply reorganized the article slightly for better communication of information. I did not change any sources. JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 07:26, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
November 2023
[edit]Hi JuxtaposedJacob! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. glman (talk) 20:59, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Which article was it? JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 21:01, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
March music
[edit]story · music · places |
---|
Thank you for your support for a MoS change, saying: "We need to bring old policies in line with current consensus". - Bach music for Easter! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Translation assistance
[edit]Hello, I'm KB from Binance. I came across your username on WP:TRLA. I'm looking for help creating a French translation of the Richard Teng article. I worked with editors at Articles for Creation to create the article, and now am trying to find editors to help me with translations. I have prepared a French version here and was wondering if you'd be willing to take a look and if everything is good, create the translated article on the French Wikipedia? Because I have a financial conflict, I don't directly create articles related to Binance.
Thanks so much. Let me know if you have any questions. KB at Binance (talk) 07:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes review
[edit]Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
Joyous! Noise! 21:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC) Joyous! Noise! 21:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you @Joyous!
- JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 21:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
[edit]- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
thank you
[edit]Thank you. Akuindo (talk) 10:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
[edit]- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
[edit]- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?