User talk:Kanzler31

Welcome!

Hello, Kanzler31, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --A Nobody^{My talk} 02:22, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kolonat

A tag has been placed on Kolonat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Glenfarclas (talk) 23:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Mexico national football team. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GoPurple 'n Gold₂₄ 00:08, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Mexico national football team. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. GoPurple 'n Gold₂₄ 06:28, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of countries were The Penguins of Madagascar airs

I have nominated List of countries were The Penguins of Madagascar airs, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of countries were The Penguins of Madagascar airs. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Shadowjams (talk) 09:04, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 FIFA World Cup (video game)

Hello Kanzler, I'm just dropping you a note to let you know that I've removed the 'key features' section from this article because it is copied and pasted from Fifa Informer. It is very important to avoid copying and pasting copyrighted material into Wikipedia, please see WP:COPYVIO. I'm concerned that despite the article being protected to prevent an anonymous user adding this material, you've since readded despite several editors trying to keep it off the article. Please take a look at the WP:COPYVIO link. Thank you. Someone another 01:10, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I've reverted the teams list again, for the reasons already stated on the article's talk page. Please feel free to discuss it there if you feel strongly about it, though I should say that while articles you mentioned in your edit summary, such as PES 2010, FIFA 09, etc. may have such lists, they shouldn't, so it's not really a justification in this case. Thanks, Miremare 18:24, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Honduras' Jersies

you fcked them up dude lol (just letting you know, there was some sort of error)

User:Oak27 User_talk:Oak27

Proto-English

Hi, I've made some comments at Talk:Proto-English. Could you give me some pointers to the literature you have based this on? Cheers, -- Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:53, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Astore Sports

A tag has been placed on Astore Sports requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 06:09, 16 May 2010 (UTC) ==[reply]

Euro 2012 Group A

Hi - how do you know which stadiums the games will be played at? I'm partiuclarly interested in Belgium's games, as I'll be attending all of them! Cheers - robccfc —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robccfc (talk • contribs) 11:56, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have the same question about Lithuanian national team. Where did you find that? Source please. Thank you. Felicilijonas (talk) 22:52, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Kanzler31! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 333 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Aldyr Garcia Schlee - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:29, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mutual intelligibility

Hello. You recently added a citation to a book from the "Webster's Quotations, Facts and Phrases" series published by Icon Group International to this article. Unfortunately, Icon Group International is not a reliable source - their books are computer-generated, with most of the text copied from Wikipedia (most entries have [WP] by them to indicate this, see e.g. [1]).

I've only removed the reference, not the text it was referencing. A lot of similar references have been removed as they are circular references; many other editors have also been duped by these sources. Despite giving an appearance of reliability, the name "Webster's" has been public domain since the late 19th century. Another publisher to be wary of as they reuse Wikipedia articles is Alphascript Publishing. Fences&Windows 00:01, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re-File talk:Human Language Families (wikicolors).png

I agree with you about Nigerian Pidgin English in Lagos, etc. I've updated it. French, Portugese and English occer in many citys in Africa.--Wipsenade (talk) 18:03, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I also added the Papuan language isolate, Kuot to it now! ----Wipsenade (talk) 15:42, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nigerian Standard English for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nigerian Standard English is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigerian Standard English until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 19:56, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Nomination of Concacaf.tv for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Concacaf.tv is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concacaf.tv until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 23:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]