Jump to content

User talk:Lawscholar0904

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Lawscholar0904! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 18:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Christian M. Ravndal
added a link pointing to Luther College
Elizabeth M. Allen
added a link pointing to Steve Goldstein
Michelle Giuda
added a link pointing to John Kirby

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Second cabinet of Donald Trump, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see MOS:JOBTITLES.Eyer (he/him) If you reply, add {{reply to|Eyer}} to your message. 20:42, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hamer v. Sidway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Denis O’Brien.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at LeBron James. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:41, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. ElKevbo (talk) 03:28, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? I have not added unsourced or poorly sourced content! Lawscholar0904 (talk) 14:43, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[1][2] You're actually at the verge of violating 3RR on the UConn page. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:02, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I’m not sure what you’re referring to… could you please explain this a little farther? Lawscholar0904 (talk) 15:04, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Those are diffs of unsourced edits you have made in the last 24 hours. And if you need more explanation I'll drop the edit warring template for you to give you a better understanding. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at University of Connecticut School of Law shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

John F. Cushman moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to John F. Cushman. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 02:53, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James A. Peden (March 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taabii was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Taabii (talk) 07:39, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Lawscholar0904! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Taabii (talk) 07:39, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert C. Kirk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franklin College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clarence E. Gauss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]