User talk:Lj123
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
Chris Troutman (talk) 20:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
California!
[edit]Hey Lj123, Great to see another Californian on Wikipedia. Curious, Do you ever attend any of the WikiFoundation Meetups? All the Best, Chefmikesf (talk) 00:38, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Reviewing additions to Louis XIII (cognac)
[edit]Hi Lj, I saw you're a member of WP:FRANCE and I was wondering if you'd be interested in helping review my new draft for Louis XIII (cognac). I outlined the changes on the talk page. The current article was translated in part from the French article, so I'm looking for feedback from someone with some experience with French. If you've got any time to take a look at it, even in part, I'd greatly appreciate it.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 18:26, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Vancouver International Airport
[edit]Why are you afraid of giving individual sources at Vancouver International Airport? You are not interested in a policy as WP:V? Or is it just WP:IDONTLIKEIT? The Banner talk 16:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Show me where policy requires a separate source for each destination Lj123 (talk) 16:13, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Read the RFC. The Banner talk 03:28, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Still don't see it Lj123 (talk) 03:48, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- I assume this is to what you refer:
- " This discussion reached a clear consensus that neither of the articles in questions violates WP:NOT. Proponents argued that both lists are indiscriminate collections of information. Opponents disputed this, saying that just because information is in list format doesn't mean it's covered by WP:NOT and that a list of destinations is an important and encyclopedic piece of information about an airport. Personally, I'm inclined towards saying they do violate WP:NOT, but it's not my job as a closer to vote, it's to represent the consensus, and the consensus was very clearly, over 2:1, that they don't."
- This contains no mention of references being required to be distinct for each destination nor that they must be cited beside each destination as opposed to the current method. Lj123 (talk) 03:53, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Still don't see it Lj123 (talk) 03:48, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Read the RFC. The Banner talk 03:28, 9 May 2025 (UTC)