User talk:Mpen320

Libertarian Democrat

Hello, Mpen320. You have new messages at Talk:Libertarian Democrat#Casing: libertarian Democrat or Libertarian Democrat.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Userboxes

Hi Mpen320. The boxes you can put on your user page are simply called userboxes. That link should tell you how to get them. It is as simple as adding something like {{Template:User wikipedia}}. Formatting can be a bit trickier but there are pages to guide you through that. There are pages upon pages of userboxes you can add, linked by category. If you need more help just leave a message on my talk page. Good luck! –CWenger (talk) 12:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An apology

I just wanted to say that, though my edits (and indeed my edit summaries) might not give that impression, I really do appreciate your contributions to United States House of Representatives elections in Illinois, 2012. Looking back, it probably wasn't necessary to get rid of all your content and try to write it from scratch. Just so people in future don't make the same mistake I did there, you might want to take a look at Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Citing sources—when you're in a hurry they're easy to forget, but references are pretty much always necessary and also massively useful in helping other editors determine whether what you've written is actually correct. Again, thanks for your contributions and don't be disheartened by my overzealous editing earlier. – hysteria18 (talk) 00:55, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source information needed for File:Cullerton.jpg

Hello, Mpen320!

It was really helpful of you to upload File:Cullerton.jpg. However, in order to keep and use new images, we need to know their original source.

If you can edit the description page and add this information, that would be great. If you're not sure how or need help, please ask at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Cullerton.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cullerton.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:27, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The questions on your user page

WP:PRIMER is intended as a one-stop guide
WP:Writing better articles is the next step after WP:Your first article
WP:CITE for adding citations
Help:Files and WP:Picture tutorial for images
WP:Userboxes for your user page

JohnCD (talk) 23:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Cullerton

You don't need most of the advice I was going to give based on your first version (make it less promotional, don't call him "President" Cullerton). I would suggest leaving out the voting statistics for the "Village president" election - it seems a bit trivial, now that he is in the State Senate. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 23:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Wikipedia:Image use policy is the starting point. Image copyright is a problem: almost any photo is copyright to someone, usually the photographer, or someone he assigned it to if it was published.

There is an organization, Wikimedia Commons, separate from Wikipedia, which stores images for use in any Wikimedia project, but their images must be genuinely free for anyone to use for any purpose including commercial - licenses like CC-BY-NC with a "no commercial use" restriction are unacceptable.

You may well find the Illinois Senators' office prepared to give you pictures, but if they are to be accepted they would have to be free of any restriction such as "Wikipedia-only" or "No commercial use" - this last is usually the sticking point.

The Commons Upload Wizard gives you an outline, and there is a link at the bottom to their Help desk which could give you more advice about what sort of permission you would need to get from the Senators' offices and how to verify it.

Wikipedia is prepared to use non-free images under very carefully restricted circumstances - they have to satisfy all ten of the conditions at WP:NFCC. This is mainly useful for things like logos and book or album covers. Unfortunately it is no use for living people, because they fail WP:NFCC#1: "no free equivalent is available, or could be created" - it is always possible to go and take a free photo.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:01, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Emanuel Chris Welch

Hi - just a reminder to return to Emanuel Chris Welch to fix it up - it was clearly a copy-and-paste from the article about Rep. Thaddeus Jones. I made a couple of easy corrections but there's more to do. Cheers, PK T(alk) 11:54, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-and-paste is certainly allowed - it was just that when I encountered the article, it was talking about a different person than its title, and you had moved on to work on other articles. PK T(alk) 12:12, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Senator Manar.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Senator Manar.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Senator Manar.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Senator Manar.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:21, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Senator Manar.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Senator Manar.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CongLinks VoteSmart

We use these at the state level. If an old-version code is being used, please fix it rather than deleting it. Also, ILGA still has a problem of making it eay to find a legislator's previous sessions. See one of the State Senators in a low-number district for the current format to use. 184.78.81.245 (talk) 16:22, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Top right corner only says "Log in". If someone doesn't want to log in, they'll try to use the session box in the lefthand banner and get tangled. Perhaps ILGA wants to track users? 184.78.81.245 (talk) 17:46, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried it? Total debacle might be more acurate than 'tangled'. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for them to fix it. 184.78.81.245 (talk) 02:38, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP Manual of Style

Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biographies, as some of your edits are in conflict. For example, we use the person's full name, including nickname, to begin the first sentence. This is almost always different from the person's "commonly known as" name which is used for the title of an article, with disambiguation added as needed. It's supposed to be different, as one is used for searching and one is used for completeness.

There's also Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital_letters and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Abbreviations#Symbols regarding your creation of section titles.

In general, it's a good idea to find a good, current article which is similar to what you're working on, and follow its formatting. Our work is based on consensus, particularly on similar articles such as legislators, as it improves the user experience. Please fix your errors, as no volunteer has the time or inclination to clean up after you. 184.78.81.245 (talk) 16:33, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jaime Andrade Jr. may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[http://www.ilga.gov/house/Rep.asp?GA=98&MemberID=2066/Official ILGA Profile]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:16, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Brian W. Stewart

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Mpen320, thanks for creating Brian W. Stewart!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. 1

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 11:22, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 30 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Gregg Goslin page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Richey

I have no real opinion about what the best outcome is, but A7 deletions are only for cases where's the no indication of why someone might plausibly believe the person could meet WP:N; in this case, both being an alderman and being a republican candidate for (whatever) are both reasons to believe there may be sufficient sources out there to meet WP:N. I didn't say the article should ultimately stay, only that it doesn't qualify for A7 speedy deletion. You can certainly consider AFD, PROD, or Boldly merging, if you feel it's appropriate. I haven't spent time any significant time looking for sources, so I can't make any recommendations. Wily D 09:57, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your articles on various Illinois politicians :). Keep up the good work! Ironholds (talk) 04:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Adam Brown (Illinois politician) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Roupas AFD

You need to finish following the AFD instructions by substituting the AFD template and creating the page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Roupas (2nd nomination), somehow your nomination got tangled up with the first AFD for that page. Thanks, shoy (reactions) 16:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 11 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Geneva, Illinois page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Hampshire Libertarians

Hi Mpen320, hope you're well. I noticed that you added the articles Don Gorman, Finlay Rothhaus, Calvin Warburton, Ken Fanning and Andy Borsa to the Members of the Libertarian Party category. My interpretation of the guideline on subcategorisation suggests to me they needn't be in that category, as they're in the subcategories for Libertarians from their respective states (New Hampshire Libertarians for Gorman, Rothhaus, Warburton and Borsa, and Alaska Libertarians for Fanning), which are in the parent category Libertarian Party (United States) politicians, which is in turn a subcategory of the "Members of the Libertarian Party" category. Per the guideline, "an article should be categorised as low down in the category hierarchy as possible, without duplication in parent categories above it." The guideline provides for exceptions, which I don't fully understand, but I don't think this would constitute such an exception. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts – Arms & Hearts (talk) 01:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied at my talk page. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:48, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dick Durbin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:AmeyaPawar.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:AmeyaPawar.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:51, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:WalterBurnettJr.png

A tag has been placed on File:WalterBurnettJr.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [2], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:DonneTrotter.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DonneTrotter.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:BobFioretti.png

Thanks for uploading File:BobFioretti.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mpen320. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replying to you

Um, in the future, try signing your posts so that I don't have to guess who exactly is saying what to me and making me waste a bunch of time trying to figure it out. My talk page history says that you've been there only twice, spread a little over a year apart, and neither time did you sign your post. See Help:Using talk pages#Sign your contributions if you're confused. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 01:27, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Dale Fowler) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dale Fowler, Mpen320!

Wikipedia editor Meatsgains just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work on Dale Fowler!

To reply, leave a comment on Meatsgains's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

License tagging for File:Dudley during NH Governor's Council meeting.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dudley during NH Governor's Council meeting.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:34, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Austin, Chicago, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Columbus Park and Austin Historic District. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bob Biggins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assessor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Baldermann

Hello, I noticed you started the deletion process for Tim Baldermann but haven't yet created a discussion page. This is just a friendly reminder to create that page and list it in the daily AFD log (see the steps at WP:AFDHOWTO) so other editors can weigh in on the article. Thanks. clpo13_(talk) 22:23, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for all your hard work on Illinois articles! Uncle Roy (talk) 02:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Special districts in Illinois. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:55, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Many thank for the Illinois Barnstar. The Illinois Constitutional Convention of 1970 was an very interesting event; Consequently I followed Illinois politics even though I live in Wisconsin. Again my thanks-RFD (talk) 16:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Illinois local government

Hi-I notice your edits about Illinois counties; county board of commissioners being different from county boards, etc. Is it possible about starting an article about Illinois local government? Many thanks-RFD (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The local government article for Illinois is Administrative divisions of Illinois. I do believe an expansion is in order and I am open to helping. For example, I already created Special districts in Illinois, but that's largely taken verbatim from the 2012 United States Census of Governments. In Illinois our high number of local governments is a political issue. A lot of information is from sources I would consider bias (e.g. Illinois Policy Institute). This is going to make finding information about Illinois government a bit more work intensive than my edits and article creations for Illinois General Assembly members, which between the Blue Book, resolutions and pages 1-2 of Google results are fairly easy to crank out. Does that help at all? -Mpen320 (talk) 13:10, 19 July 2017 (CT)

Illinois county government

Hi- Here is a link about Illinois county government I found: Illinois-Forms of County Government. I will tried to keep track which Illinois counties has what form of government. With 102 counties, it may be difficult-many thanks-RFD (talk) 11:32, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Badgerlink

Hi-Being a Wisconsin resident I access Badgerlink with my public library card. Badgerlink also has access to the newspapers. Maybe your state has something similar. Badgerlink is provided by the Wisconsin government for Wisconsin residents. Many thanks-RFD (talk) 09:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Deletion of Cliff Hyra

Sorry for deleting the AfD template I did it because I thought you could it since I have seen a lot of people doing that and just put their reason in the edit summary.

No need for an apology. Mpen320 (talk) 04:16, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Questions about endorsement boxes

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I have questions about Template:Endorsement boxes

Does Wikipedia have a set criteria for who can and cannot be included in endorsement boxes?
What constitutes an endorsement? I have seen campaign contributions constituted as endorsements. I disagree with this, but if it does then
Is there a such thing as a limited notability figure? This would be an otherwise not notable individual whose endorsement is worth mentioning because they are in a position of importance in an election (e.g. a county party chair endorsing in a primary election).
Are there any other questions I should have asked, but did not?

Mpen320 (talk) 15:56, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you mean Template:Endorsements box.

I don't think Wikipedia has set criteria beyond the general ones - verifiability and avoiding undue weight.
If reliable sources call it an endorsement, it is. If no reliable source calls it an endorsement, neither should we.
If no independent reliable sources report on an endorsement, the endorsement is too insignificant and shouldn't be added to the box. There may be more strict criteria for high-profile elections where candidates receive lots of endorsements. If the mayor of one or another of the Fayettevilles endorses a presidential candidate and the local paper reports on it, that does constitute coverage in a reliable independent source, but may still be held to be too insignificant.
If in doubt, the inclusion criteria should be discussed on the relevant article's talk page. A relevant WikiProject such as WikiProject Elections and Referendums may have further advice. Huon (talk) 17:36, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join Women in Red

Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past couple of months. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
If you would like to receive messages about our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. If you would prefer to not receive additional notices of our monthly activities, you can let us know on our opt-out list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.1% of English Wikipedia's biographies).

Our priorities for September:

Hispanic and Latina women Women in the Olympics Women from New Zealand

Coming up in October:

Women and disability Healthcare Geofocus: Nordic countries

Continuing from month to month:

#1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 13:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Illinois House of Representatives elections, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Willowbrook, Illinois (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bob O'Dekirk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bob O'Dekirk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob O'Dekirk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GetSomeUtah (talk) 14:34, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IL Gov Race

According to what is Capitol Fax a reliable polling site. Regardless of such credentials as a news site, there needs to be a detailed methodological report in order for a poll to be considered valid, if you show me such then I will second your statement. Allinallisallweallare (talk) 21:41, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I find it weird the only poll you only have an issue is the poll that has Kennedy losing to Pritzker, yet seem to have no qualms with the one of the Republican primary. You made no other effort to delete the other We Ask America poll. Nor have you expressed any other issues with Kennedy's internal polling. Your only edits so far have been this article and Chris Kennedy's article. This is not a forum for you to campaign for Chris Kennedy. Please cease these nonconstructive edits.--Mpen320 (talk) 21:57, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let's take those down too then. Allinallisallweallare (talk) 22:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Explain to me how widely published journalist Rich Miller's commissioned poll on the Governor's race is not credible? Mpen320

Capitol Fax is a blog, it does not go through the same vetting process as a poll commissioned by a reputable news source would, we have no idea where this poll's intentions lie, nor do we know where the internally commissioned polls intentions lie. In addition, there is no credible report methodologically or otherwise to validate the Kennedy or the Capitol Fax polls.

Allinallisallweallare (talk) 22:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rich Miller is a credible source and We Ask America is a legitimate polling firm. You haven't cited how it's not other than the vague reasoning that "it's a blog." We Ask America is used on United States Senate election in Illinois, 2014, Illinois gubernatorial election, 2010, and Illinois gubernatorial election, 2014. Survey Monkey polls are shown on United States Senate election in Illinois, 2016. If you would like to note these issues in the section(s) on polling that would be helpful, but the wholesale deletion of all the article's polling (a lot of content) requires consensus. I have moved this discussion to Talk:Illinois gubernatorial election, 2018 where we are working on consensus. I invite you to join us.--Mpen320 (talk) 22:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mpen320. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Illinois Senate elections, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington Park, Chicago (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:26, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Illinois gubernatorial election, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dan Cronin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Committeemen and Committeewomen (Cook County, Illinois), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Edward Burke, John Daley and Aaron Goldstein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMCAST

See this. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 15:37, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:33, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of notable party switchers in the United States

Hi, while the author of an article can add tags for Wikiprojects, usually members of a particular Wikiproject will tag articles that they're interested in. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Conservatism/FAQ. – Lionel^(talk) 09:50, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ricardo Muñoz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Garfield Park, Chicago (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mpen320. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have repaired your cut-and-paste page move

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Robert F. Martwick Jr. a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Robert Martwick. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:23, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Englewood, Chicago, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wired (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:46, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your work on Illinois articles, local, state, and federal alike. Because of your efforts, the Illinois wikipedia pages look a whole lot better. I hope that I can follow along in my contributions to the state legislature pages in the same way you have. BWellsOdyssey (talk) 16:49, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Washington Heights, Chicago

Dear Mpen320,

I was thinking of taking Washington Heights, Chicago to FAC sometime next week; I was wondering if you'd be willing to take a look at it beforehand and see if there are any improvements you can think of, or if you'd be willing to collaborate on it. (It's fine if you've never been there, neither have I.) Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks!
– John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:39, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your work on this article (and all the Chicago articles) is incredible. I would definitely want to collaborate. I'll get back to you later on potential improvements.--Mpen320 (talk) 02:00, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Fantastic! I look forward to it. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:39, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - A mention of the Brainerd Bungalow Historic District and any facts from the NRHP submission. The information in there is likely within the article already, but it looks like it is worth a read.
    - A street map not unlike
    - An expanded section for government (though located in Chicago Public Schools might be filler that doesn't help FAC).
    - A housing section that could incorporate this Cityscape article
    - Many other Chicago articles include CTA Bus routes. Could that be added to the transportation section?
      - Thank you for your feedback. I've started a section on Brainerd that I'll expand later. I'll add the rest in the next upcoming days. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 06:51, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will nominate the article for FAC later tonight after I've finished it up. Would you like to be a co-nominator for it? – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 21:11, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'll be nominating it in about half an hour and mentioning you in it if you don't mind. Thanks for your thoughts, and hopefully it will go well! :) – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. And in case anyone asks, I am absolutely in favor of FAC.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Chicago mayoral election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brandon Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SouthEast Service, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:32, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kam Buckner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doug Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Judith A. Myers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jesse White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chicago City Council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington Park, Chicago (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pushback

Absolutely, yes. It's always worse in US election years than UK or Canadian or Australian ones, but this is really something else. I blame people being stuck at home with nothing better to do. Bearcat (talk) 03:47, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearcat:. How hard do we push back? I don't want COVID-19 to radically lower the bar to be "notable," but would prefer not to increase the amount of time I spend on Wikipedia to engage with those who want candidates to receive articles.--Mpen320 (talk) 20:42, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reaching out

I wish to talk to Mpen320. I am Sfa102 and I am the actual living person in the article Randal E Thomas. I rewrote the article and now need help. Sfa102 (talk) 17:53, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sig

Hey! I saw that you forgot to sign this post. Cheers! - Location (talk) 01:13, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elga L. Jefferies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Margaret Smith.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jim Durkin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Cross.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 United States House of Representatives elections in Illinois, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Peters.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

help with a mayor page

Hi! I was wondering if you could help me. I saw that you created the article about Ed Zabrocki, the Tinley Park mayor, a couple years ago. I was thinking of trying to get an article up about the Orland Park mayor, Keith Pekau. I drafted some text in my sandbox (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MaxineJP/sandbox). You've been around here longer, so I was wondering if you would mind publishing it?--MaxineJP (talk) 18:35, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you reaching out, but I have to decline to publish your draft article. It is well written, but I believe Wikipedia's notability guidelines for politicians would find that Keith Pekau would not meet the notability guidelines for a Wikipedia article (at least at this time). Ed Zabrocki qualified because of his time as a state legislator which per the guidelines gives automatic notability to the subject. There are some "purely local" Mayors who have Wikipedia articles, such as Robert L. Butler and Donald Stephens, but their notability comes from having unusually long times in office (over fifty years). If by chance you are affiliated with his campaign, I will also note that an article about a person is not inherently helpful to the person and may even be a net negative for Keith Pekau's campaign. For example, Bruce Rauner who supported Pekau's first campaign is still pretty unpopular in the state. An article with that information could turn off some voters to Pekau's candidacy. A good essay about this written by User:Sebwite is here.--Mpen320 (talk) 19:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand. Thank you for taking the time to explain. If Keith wins the election, I'll circle back on this. Thanks! --MaxineJP (talk) 16:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

James Reilly article

As you created this article, I thought you'd be the best person to ask. In the Government career and appointments section, there is a sentence which starts "Reilly left to fun the MPEA". Should that be "fund" or "found"? Editrite! (talk) 08:12, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Please let me know if you think "established" clears it up. He was the first executive director.--Mpen320 (talk) 02:13, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate articles

I think the issue is that candidates aren't always actually writing the articles themselves — sometimes it is the candidate or their campaign staff, but sometimes it's just an unaffiliated editor who genuinely (but wrongly) thinks candidates are supposed to have articles. So people may think "that essay doesn't apply to me, because I'm not the person the article is about". Bearcat (talk) 13:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Michael McKinley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blackburn College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Ted Schwinden

On 10 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ted Schwinden, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 09:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello Mpen320, we need experienced volunteers.

New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.
If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions. You can apply for the user-right HERE.
If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message at the reviewer's discussion board.
Cheers, and hope to see you around.

Sent by NPP Coordination using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Chris Miller (politician" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Chris Miller (politician has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 20 § Chris Miller (politician until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:15, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lake View, Chicago, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Gunter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Latham Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2014 Northern Mariana Islands general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rota.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mistaken edit

Please undo: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Mariana_Islands%27s_at-large_congressional_district&diff=next&oldid=1222662241 You removed required accessibility features such as a table caption and semantic scopes. Why did you do this? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? Feel free to revert my edit. You can include that in the comments. Or incorporate my edits while re-adding whatever I allegedly removed.--Mpen320 (talk) 19:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All data tables need table captions. The table previously had one and you removed it. Table captions are situated at the beginning and start with |+. Scopes were previously in the table and identiied columns and rows with !scope="col" and !scope="row". I can readd these. Thanks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Florida Dixiecrats has been nominated for splitting

Category:Florida Dixiecrats has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:16, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 United States presidential election in Michigan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axios.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Just a reminder, per WP:MINOR, this is not considered a minor edit. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 21:43, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not (at least purposefully) mark this as a minor edit. Mpen320 (talk) 21:47, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Take care. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 21:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]