User talk:MuhammadRiyad

Welcome!

Hi Readul01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Paradoctor (talk) 03:13, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Bogra, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dewanbag Sharif

A tag has been placed on Draft:Dewanbag Sharif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This is the draft page of Dewanbag Sharif. I am one of the contributor of the article. After complete it was moved to Article page. The need of the draft is no more. So I request to delete the draft.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MahdiRiyad (talk) 14:20, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MuhammadRiyad. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 21:29, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MuhammadRiyad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not aware of Sockpuppet before. I apologize for the mistake I made. I respect Wikipedia's rules and will continue to do so in the future. I would like to contribute to Wikipedia, but if my account is blocked, I cannot contribute. Therefore, I request that the account be unblocked. Hossain Muhammad (talk) 09:48, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Usually the way forward in sock puppetry cases is the standard offer; no editing under any account or IP for six months as a show of good faith. 331dot (talk) 08:30, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request to unlock me

@331dot Dear administrator, I realized my mistake and read Wikipedia's rules carefully. I promise that such a mistake won't happen again. Please unlock me. Hossain Muhammad (talk) 14:11, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm an admin with 13 years of experience and I haven't read every rule, there are more than you probably think. You don't need to read every rule. You do, however, need to make a new unblock request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 15:02, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

MuhammadRiyad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account and IP have been suspended for violating a Wikipedia policy without my knowledge. I understand my mistake. I promise that this will not happen again in the future. I am willing to contribute properly. Please unblock me so that I can contribute to Wikipedia. Hossain Muhammad (talk) 17:14, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=My account and IP have been suspended for violating a Wikipedia policy without my knowledge. I understand my mistake. I promise that this will not happen again in the future. I am willing to contribute properly. Please unblock me so that I can contribute to Wikipedia. [[User:MuhammadRiyad|Hossain Muhammad]] ([[User talk:MuhammadRiyad#top|talk]]) 17:14, 2 June 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=My account and IP have been suspended for violating a Wikipedia policy without my knowledge. I understand my mistake. I promise that this will not happen again in the future. I am willing to contribute properly. Please unblock me so that I can contribute to Wikipedia. [[User:MuhammadRiyad|Hossain Muhammad]] ([[User talk:MuhammadRiyad#top|talk]]) 17:14, 2 June 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=My account and IP have been suspended for violating a Wikipedia policy without my knowledge. I understand my mistake. I promise that this will not happen again in the future. I am willing to contribute properly. Please unblock me so that I can contribute to Wikipedia. [[User:MuhammadRiyad|Hossain Muhammad]] ([[User talk:MuhammadRiyad#top|talk]]) 17:14, 2 June 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Hi there, can you please explain what you did that caused you to be blocked, and why you did it? I understand you did not realize there was a rule against what you had done, but I would still like to hear you explain. -- asilvering (talk) 20:49, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]