User talk:Niikwabena

This is Niikwabena's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: RG Qluck Wise (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:COI.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RG Qluck Wise and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:19, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Greenman,

I hope this message finds you well. I am seeking assistance in rewriting the Wikipedia article on Wisdom Odai Ashong, known professionally as RG Qluck Wise, to ensure it aligns with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly regarding neutrality, verifiability, and reliable sourcing.

Concerns:

Neutrality: The current article may contain promotional language that does not adhere to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy.

Verifiability: Some statements lack citations from reliable, third-party sources, making it difficult to verify the information presented.

Notability: It is unclear if the subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies, particularly in the absence of significant coverage from independent sources.

Request:

Could you please assist in revising this article to ensure it complies with Wikipedia's content policies? Specifically, I would appreciate your help in:

Removing any promotional language to maintain a neutral tone.

Adding citations from reliable, independent sources to verify the information.

Assessing the subject's notability and determining if the article meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria.

Your expertise in editing and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines would be invaluable in improving the quality and reliability of this article.

Thank you for your time and assistance.

Best regards,

Niikwabena Niikwabena (talk) 11:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use AI tools to generate talk page posts (or any other text you add to Wikipedia). Thanks! --bonadea contributions talk 11:07, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Niikwabena (talk) 11:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Niikwabena! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 10:19, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RG Qluck Wise (January 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: His books are self-published, so he does not meet the notability criteria for authors. BroadwayWorld is a generally unreliable source, as explained here. No sign of notability as a musician either; an article about him was deleted after this community discussion three years ago, and it doesn't look like anything has changed since then to make him more notable. There are no reliable, independent, secondary sources in the draft, but there are multiple copies of the same press releases.

bonadea contributions talk 11:03, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your concern.

I've checked and realized BroadwayWorld is generally unreliable source but for my opinion GhanaWeb is reliable source Established in 1999, GhanaWeb is a reputable online portal offering a wide range of content, including news, opinions, and background information related to Ghana. Niikwabena (talk) 11:27, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bonadea I need your reply on this

I've checked and realized BroadwayWorld is generally unreliable source but for my opinion GhanaWeb is reliable source Established in 1999, GhanaWeb is a reputable online portal offering a wide range of content, including news, opinions, and background information related to Ghana. Niikwabena (talk) 11:40, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This one? No, it's a paid placement written by the person himself – it clearly states so at the bottom of the page. And it is obvious from the text that it is a promo piece with no informational value. --bonadea contributions talk 16:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, it's a paid article written by the person himself so I guess nothing can done about it?

Best regards, Niikwabena (talk) 16:31, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]