User talk:Nthep
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - May 2025
[edit]![]() The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter |
The May 2025 issue of the Project Newsletter is now available. |
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
08:25, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 May 2025
[edit]- In the media: Feds aiming for WMF's nonprofit status
- Recent research: How readers use Wikipedia health content; Scholars generally happy with how their papers are cited on Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: Sysop Tinucherian removed and admonished by the ArbCom
- Discussion report: Latest news from Centralized discussions
- Traffic report: Of Wolf and Man
- Disinformation report: At WikiCredCon, Wikipedia editors and Internet Archive discuss threats to trust in media
- News from the WMF: Product & Tech Progress on the Annual Plan
- Comix: By territory
- Community view: A deep dive into Wikimedia
- Debriefing: Barkeep49's RfB debriefing
Hi Nthep, I forgot your username and had to go through the entire list of admins looking for one that starts with an N, lol. Do you remember revdel-ing articles with direct copies of their plots from an obvious copyrighted website? I mean, per WP:MOSPLOT, they're supposed to be "summaries" but I see articles with direct copies from external websites? Is that normal or I'm just overthinking? There's also MOS:FAIR USE which shed more light, but I do not understand why editors still copy plots from external websites; are they not aware or, again, am I just overthinking? See Blossom (Chinese TV series) and Dhai Aakhar for example. I'm aware that sometimes it's the external websites that copy from Wikipedia though, and I can spot those. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:57, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have no qualms about deleting plots that are straightforward copyvios. There's a requirement to but some effort into using OWNWORDS. Nthep (talk) 18:06, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #678
[edit]Extended content
|
---|
![]() Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata in the
week leading up to 2025-05-05. Missed the previous one? See issue #677. Translations are available Discussions
Events
Press, articles, blog posts, videos
Tool of the week
Other Noteworthy Stuff
Newest properties and property proposals to review
You can comment on all open property proposals! Did you know ?
Development
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer. Weekly Tasks
|
Administrators' newsletter – May 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2025).

Rusalkii
NaomiAmethyst (overlooked last month)
Interface administrator changes
- Following an RfC, administrator elections were permanently authorized on a five-month schedule. The next election will be scheduled soon; see Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections for more information. This is an alternate process to the RfA process and does not replace the latter.
- An RfC was closed with consensus to allow editors to opt-out of seeing "sticky decorative elements". Such elements should now be wrapped in {{sticky decoration wrapper}}. Editors who wish to opt out can follow the instructions at WP:STICKYDECO.
- An RfC has resulted in a broad prohibition on the use of AI-generated images in articles. A few common-sense exceptions are recognized.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2025 to reduce the backlog of articles in the new pages feed. Sign up here to participate!
Wikidata weekly summary #679
[edit]Extended content
|
---|
![]() Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata in the
week leading up to 2025-05-12. Missed the previous one? See issue #678. Translations are available Events
Press, articles, blog posts, videos
Tool of the week
Other Noteworthy Stuff
Newest properties and property proposals to review
You can comment on all open property proposals! Did you know?
Development
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer. Weekly Tasks
|
Books & Bytes – Issue 68
[edit]Issue 68, March–April 2025
In this issue we highlight two resource renewals, #EveryBookItsReader, a note about Phabricator, and, as always, a roundup of news and community items related to libraries and digital knowledge.
Read the full newsletterSent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:18, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Those Who Stayed
[edit]Hi, do you mind undoing your revdel on Those Who Stayed? Seems that the website's episode list was taken from the Ukrainian Wikipedia article and translated into English. — Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:30, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Tenshi Hinanawi done. Wish things were simpler at times :-) Nthep (talk) 20:55, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 May 2025
[edit]- In the media: Wikimedia Foundation sues over UK government decision that might require identity verification of editors worldwide
- Disinformation report: What does Jay-Z know about Wikipedia?
- Technology report: WMF introduces unique but privacy-preserving browser cookie
- Debriefing: Goldsztajn's RfA debriefing
- Obituary: Max Lum (User:ICOHBuzz)
- Community view: A Deep Dive Into Wikimedia (part 2)
- Comix: Collection
- From the archives: Humor from the Archives
Could you Review my changes
[edit]I updated this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaiah_Bowman I added a citation and an institution.
I was not sure if The Explorers Club is in the correct place. Also on the Explorers Club Wiki page, his names is referenced but I was not sure how to add a link to jump to his name.
Thanks, Peter Pgmpjl (talk) 18:41, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- Replied at your talk page. Nthep (talk) 19:15, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]moved to sub page
Wikidata weekly summary #680
[edit]Extended content
|
---|
![]() Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata in the
week leading up to 2025-05-19. Missed the previous one? See issue #679. Help with Translations. Discussions
Events
Press, articles, blog posts, videos
Tool of the week
Other Noteworthy Stuff
Newest properties and property proposals to review
You can comment on all open property proposals! Did you know?
Development
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer. Weekly Tasks
|
Rekha Rodwittiya
[edit]It looks like one of my edits on Rekha Rodwittiya was accidentally revdel'd as part of a copyvio-revdel request range. Would you mind undoing the revdel on my edit? Thanks, Referentis (talk) 17:53, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Done. Nthep (talk) 18:03, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #681
[edit]Extended content
|
---|
![]() Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata in the
week leading up to 2025-05-27. Missed the previous one? See issue #680. Help with Translations. Discussions
Events
Press, articles, blog posts, videos
Tool of the week
Other Noteworthy Stuff
Newest properties and property proposals to review
You can comment on all open property proposals! Did you know?
Weekly Tasks
|
Question regarding The Godfather copyvio
[edit]Hey there, just wanted to ask why it is that it's not necessary to revdel the diff with the link? There's no question that the content hosted at that website is absolutely a copyright violation (unauthorised distribution of the movie), so is it the case that because the edit only links to a copyright violation but does not directly include it, revdel isn't required? Or is it something else entirely? Weirdguyz (talk) 14:22, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Weirdguyz Correct, links to copyvios aren't covered by REVDEL but removal of the link is covered under WP:COPYLINK. Nthep (talk) 14:38, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Interesting, reading through WP:REVDEL and WP:COPYLINK makes me wonder if this is sort of in a gray area, because to me, what COPYLINK says about links to copyright violations seems to be more directed at links that do serve some purpose (for citation reasons, mostly), while in this case the diff in question steers far closer to RD1 as it is just a link to a free movie website. Weirdguyz (talk) 14:56, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- #RD1 covers removing copyrighted text from the history of a WP article. A link doesn't include any content. You'll also see that these types of links aren't covered by #RD3 either unless you've additional evidence that it's phishing etc. Nthep (talk) 15:24, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Interesting, reading through WP:REVDEL and WP:COPYLINK makes me wonder if this is sort of in a gray area, because to me, what COPYLINK says about links to copyright violations seems to be more directed at links that do serve some purpose (for citation reasons, mostly), while in this case the diff in question steers far closer to RD1 as it is just a link to a free movie website. Weirdguyz (talk) 14:56, 28 May 2025 (UTC)