Jump to content

User talk:Nthep

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - May 2025

[edit]
Delivered May 2025 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

08:25, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

[edit]

Copyvio plots

[edit]

Hi Nthep, I forgot your username and had to go through the entire list of admins looking for one that starts with an N, lol. Do you remember revdel-ing articles with direct copies of their plots from an obvious copyrighted website? I mean, per WP:MOSPLOT, they're supposed to be "summaries" but I see articles with direct copies from external websites? Is that normal or I'm just overthinking? There's also MOS:FAIR USE which shed more light, but I do not understand why editors still copy plots from external websites; are they not aware or, again, am I just overthinking? See Blossom (Chinese TV series) and Dhai Aakhar for example. I'm aware that sometimes it's the external websites that copy from Wikipedia though, and I can spot those. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:57, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have no qualms about deleting plots that are straightforward copyvios. There's a requirement to but some effort into using OWNWORDS. Nthep (talk) 18:06, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #678

[edit]
Extended content

Administrators' newsletter – May 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2025).

Administrator changes

added Rusalkii
readded NaomiAmethyst (overlooked last month)
removed

Interface administrator changes

removed Galobtter

Guideline and policy news

Miscellaneous


Wikidata weekly summary #679

[edit]
Extended content

Books & Bytes – Issue 68

[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 68, March–April 2025

In this issue we highlight two resource renewals, #EveryBookItsReader, a note about Phabricator, and, as always, a roundup of news and community items related to libraries and digital knowledge.

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:18, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Those Who Stayed

[edit]

Hi, do you mind undoing your revdel on Those Who Stayed? Seems that the website's episode list was taken from the Ukrainian Wikipedia article and translated into English. — Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:30, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tenshi Hinanawi done. Wish things were simpler at times :-) Nthep (talk) 20:55, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 May 2025

[edit]

Could you Review my changes

[edit]

I updated this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaiah_Bowman I added a citation and an institution.

I was not sure if The Explorers Club is in the correct place. Also on the Explorers Club Wiki page, his names is referenced but I was not sure how to add a link to jump to his name.

Thanks, Peter Pgmpjl (talk) 18:41, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at your talk page. Nthep (talk) 19:15, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]

moved to sub page

Wikidata weekly summary #680

[edit]
Extended content

Rekha Rodwittiya

[edit]

It looks like one of my edits on Rekha Rodwittiya was accidentally revdel'd as part of a copyvio-revdel request range. Would you mind undoing the revdel on my edit? Thanks, Referentis (talk) 17:53, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Nthep (talk) 18:03, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #681

[edit]
Extended content

Question regarding The Godfather copyvio

[edit]

Hey there, just wanted to ask why it is that it's not necessary to revdel the diff with the link? There's no question that the content hosted at that website is absolutely a copyright violation (unauthorised distribution of the movie), so is it the case that because the edit only links to a copyright violation but does not directly include it, revdel isn't required? Or is it something else entirely? Weirdguyz (talk) 14:22, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Weirdguyz Correct, links to copyvios aren't covered by REVDEL but removal of the link is covered under WP:COPYLINK. Nthep (talk) 14:38, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, reading through WP:REVDEL and WP:COPYLINK makes me wonder if this is sort of in a gray area, because to me, what COPYLINK says about links to copyright violations seems to be more directed at links that do serve some purpose (for citation reasons, mostly), while in this case the diff in question steers far closer to RD1 as it is just a link to a free movie website. Weirdguyz (talk) 14:56, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
#RD1 covers removing copyrighted text from the history of a WP article. A link doesn't include any content. You'll also see that these types of links aren't covered by #RD3 either unless you've additional evidence that it's phishing etc. Nthep (talk) 15:24, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]