Jump to content

User talk:Nubia86

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Nubia86, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains(talk) 17:59, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transclusion vs. Substitution

There are two main ways to use templates on articles:

  1. Transclusion – also called "inclusion", and accomplished by using {{Template Name}}
  2. Substitution – notated like this {{subst:Template Name}}

Transclusion will include the content of Template Name on the fly whenever the article is loaded, while the latter will permanently insert the content of the template into the article. With substitution, even if the template content is modified at a later date, the article's content will not change.

Substitution is the preferred method for long-term, permanent notices because it is less confusing, and it even helps to lighten the load on the database. Substitution has the further advantage in that a template's content may be de-linked from any associated category or slightly modified to suit the circumstances, such as when the template is used on a talk page. Transclusion is preferred for displaying material that is normally updated, that way, all the places it appears are updated in a single operation.

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Copyeditor's Barnstar
For adding clarification and more specific communication through copyediting on high profile pages like Africa! Keep up the great work and I hope you keep contributing to Wikipedia. Sadads (talk) 15:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please add a blank line

[edit]

Hi. Please ensure there is a blank line above "See also" sections that you are adding, per an example of your numerous edits yesterday. Over the past week, I fixed many of your older edits, so please your edits in Kansas ghost towns. Thanks. • SbmeirowTalk07:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Fixed all about. Nubia86 (talk) 23:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! • SbmeirowTalk04:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited São Joaquim de Bicas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brazilian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Other accounts

[edit]

Hello. Do you operate any other accounts on Wikipedia? You can reply here or by email if you prefer. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Spicy (talk) 11:52, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]