User talk:OliwierJaszczyszyn

Welcome!

Hello, OliwierJaszczyszyn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Restrictions on TikTok. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Bluethricecreamman (talk) 00:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for your words! I came here from Polish Wikipedia, where I mainly contribute, but increasingly I am adding some small mentions on what happened in Poland to any relevant articles (if they are of course missing). Once again, thanks! OliwierJaszczyszyn (talk) 00:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello OliwierJaszczyszyn. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Partia Razem, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:OliwierJaszczyszyn. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=OliwierJaszczyszyn|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Prompted by this comment: Would like to note that I am only channelling the party member's doubt further and a name change suggestion wasn't of my idea ASUKITE 15:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Asukite! Besides the party member's message I received I haven't got any financial compensation, in any form - neither from them nor the political party. I am sorry that one of my comments created belief I am doing commercially-motivated edits; this is, however, false. If required I may provide you conversation history (in Polish, translated to English by me) as a proof - please reach out to me by e-mail. Thank you! OliwierJaszczyszyn (talk) 17:28, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it's just a formality here, and I apologize if I seemed accusatory at all. There is no need to put your email here (in fact, I recommend removing it - Wikipedia has an email delivery system which is a bit safer to use). Thanks for the reply! ASUKITE 17:30, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My e-mail address is public so I am not worried about that. OliwierJaszczyszyn (talk) 17:57, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]