User talk:OmmadawnDK

Welcome!

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the :::::::A fully sourced article that would never be deleted is simple to create on this subject. Just write a non-promotional, just-the-facts piece using the sources found here and here, citing those sources (and see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. The problem is not the subject matter, but the lack of encyclopedic content in the article as it has been previously posted.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:29, 31 May 2010 (UTC)date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! mark nutley (talk) 19:12, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to create Adult Children of Alcoholics

I've created User:OmmadawnDK/Adult Children of Alcoholics. Would this be good enough to move to the real wikipedia? OmmadawnDK (talk) 23:26, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Give me about 5-10 mins to check it, I suspect it's fine. Chzz ► 23:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry; I was side-tracked helping others. Very sorry. I will answer within 1 hour, I promise. Chzz ► 01:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second opinion: Chzz may or may not agree, but I think it should be okay for a start-class article, now that some significant coverage in secondary reliable sources have been found. I'd like to see them used as references rather than external links, and some of the references look self published and should be eliminated or converted to external links. The history should be expanded; it looks like note-taking now. But even with those faults, I doubt anyone would propose it for deletion in its current state. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:12, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate 2nd opinion; that's good advice.

I think it is 'good enough' so, I moved it to a live article. Let the hordes have at it, etc. Adult Children of Alcoholics.

As always, in my humble opinion, etc. but I'm a bit bold. Chzz ► 01:38, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah! OmmadawnDK (talk) 09:12, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]