User talk:Operator365

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! C F A 02:07, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edits, as I can immediately see where issue arose. I'm grateful for you taking the time to correct the page draft!

Operator365 (talk) 02:25, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Texanna Loomis has been accepted

Mary Texanna Loomis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ANU^writes 06:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Rough-and-tumble play

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rough-and-tumble play, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:44, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transient masculinization has been accepted

Transient masculinization, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 22:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great article, thank you! You may want to take a look at WP:DYK, which lets you nominate a new article to appear in the Did You Know section of the main page. Rusalkii (talk) 22:11, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Cell autonomous sex identity

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cell autonomous sex identity, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:29, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Helen Lucia Mary Pixell (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:FINDAGRAVE

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Helen Lucia Mary Pixell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:07, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Operator365! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:07, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marguerite Henry (scientist) has been accepted

Marguerite Henry (scientist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

gobonobo ⁺ ^c 20:11, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brodmann Area 52

It looks as though you've just been addressing the {{technical}} tag I added to that article several years ago. It's a lot more readable than it was, and it's nice to know the tagging achieved something. (I've left the tag there for now, but feel free to remove it if you want.) Musiconeologist (talk) 23:29, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed a borderline ambiguity in the opening sentence: which is could be taken (if not read carefully) as referring to Brodmann Area 52 rather than to the region it's a part of. Deleting which is would be one way to resolve that, assuming it resolves it in the right direction. Musiconeologist (talk) 23:39, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad something got achieved with the tag! It's always really enjoyable to be able to make those little fixes on a page as I'm trawling through. You're right about the ambiguity, so I will remove that. Also happy to remove the tag if you're satisfied. Thanks for reaching out! Operator365 (talk) 23:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. There's a satisfaction in seeing something read well that didn't before, and seeing something expressed clearly that was confusing before.

Perfectly happy about the tag! BTW, there's nothing particularly authoritative about that sort of tag—it's just the opinion of whoever added it, really. Musiconeologist (talk) 00:20, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Female masculinization hypothesis (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article has a 78% AI-generation score according to https://wikipedia.gptzero.me.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Female masculinization hypothesis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:16, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Unfortunate to see this got flagged! I've run it through myself to see if I can parse what's gone wrong. I have checked the references that have been flagged as AI - these are all fully sourced and available, though I notice nearly all of them are via Elsevier, which I thought could be notable. I will have a read through and edit regardless. Thank you. Operator365 (talk) 22:54, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]