User talk:Paper9oll
Status: 🔴 offline[?]
|
|
Committed identity: 0de937202d344a1ff750e4a22ad4cbd81b224c6550f10e765abb306e3b377d78c1fbe634497f1ed3a69a74caccfa62807438a29aa3623acb53062bdf2941e62d is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.
|
|
⚠️ Attention editors Please ensure you:
Do note that your discussion will be rolled back if you fail to meet the above requirements. Any forms of false accusations and/or personal attacks and/or harrassment will be escalated to an Administrator immediately. |
| Archived discussion: 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 |
| This talk page is automatically[?] archived by Lowercase sigmabot III every 24 hours. Threads that are stale will be automatically archived. |
Ciclope Festival , why the removal from specific artist only ?
[edit]Hi Paper90ll , Hope you are doing well. I would like to understand why you and Rachel Tensions are so keen on removing Ciclope Festivals and couple of Awards from certain artist only, whereas mainstrwam artists such as Harry styles , Coldplay all have Ciclope Festival Awards listed. I understand they are industry awards but why the rules bring followed for one artist only. Please help me undeerstand this better Jnc xavier (talk) 20:11, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Jnc xavier, by WP:BRD, I meant on Talk:RM (musician) where any involved or uninvolved editor(s) can participate in hence I will not be addressing your query here. If you've posted on the mentioned talk page, I will only address it tomorrow morning or afternoon, if applicable. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 20:12, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- WP:BRD is a general construct, BRD says we need to get into a consensus if we have differing opinions, we do not seem to be getting there. BRD is a not a wiki rule but rather a respect among editors. You seem to be working on personal vendetta without much thought to addressing fellow editor's concerns which is not right and unfair to editor forum Jnc xavier (talk) 20:19, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Jnc xavier Which part of my earlier statement "
by WP:BRD, I meant on Talk:RM (musician) where any involved or uninvolved editor(s) can participate in
" is unclear? If you (Jnc xavier), doesn't start a Dicussion on Talk:RM (musician) to gain WP:DISCUSSCONSENSUS (linked to a policy since you stated "BRD is a not a wiki rule
" hence now you cannot deny that) hence how is this statement "BRD says we need to get into a consensus if we have differing opinions, we do not seem to be getting there
" even achievable? And also, this statement "You seem to be working on personal vendetta without much thought to addressing fellow editor's concerns
" is an false accusations and/or personal attacks, in which I clearly stated in the above red notice in bold that it won't be tolerated, you were told to WP:BRD after your Bold edits were Reverted twice hence you're required to Discuss at Talk:RM (musician) as already clearly stated above in my reply. If you refuses to listen then this is considered as signs of disruptive editing. Lastly, also noting that you attempted to communicate with me only whereas another editor (@RachelTensions FYI) also Reverted your Bold edits which was why I stated to Discuss on Talk:RM (musician) so that "any involved [including me and RachelTensions] or uninvolved editor(s) can participate in
". — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 06:07, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Jnc xavier Which part of my earlier statement "
- WP:BRD is a general construct, BRD says we need to get into a consensus if we have differing opinions, we do not seem to be getting there. BRD is a not a wiki rule but rather a respect among editors. You seem to be working on personal vendetta without much thought to addressing fellow editor's concerns which is not right and unfair to editor forum Jnc xavier (talk) 20:19, 24 January 2025 (UTC)