User talk:Paristolken

Welcome!

Hi Paristolken! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 17:35, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ingeborg Gruenwald (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Coverage of this person is not significant from what I see in a search for references outside of what are included in this draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ingeborg Gruenwald and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ingeborg Gruenwald, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 17:38, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paristolken! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 17:38, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @CNMall41! Thank you for tips and comments on my article. I went to the Teahouse to look for answers, but I think I made a mistake when I started the article, so I take it back to you for more help. I hope that's ok.

This is an article that I translated from the German wikipedia page https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ingeborg_Gr%C3%BCnwald But, I realize when I looked at the page on translation that I probably started in the wrong end. If I want to translate an article from another language, do I first have to request a translation from that language before I start translating it? So should I restart the process by first asking for a translation? Or is it better to add more outside references to the article I already created? Thank you so much for your support, and the work you do, much appreciated. Paristolken (talk) 21:10, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Paristolken. For translations, I am not sure what the hardline rule is. However, I would say you can translate some or all of the page as long as what you post here meets guidelines. By that I mean you are essentially creating a new page and if you are using content from another language Wikipedia page then it is still considered new here so you must include references that show how someone is notable. With that in mind, different language Wikipedias have different rules and guidelines so something that may be notable on one language may not necessarily be notable on another. Simply having a Wikipedia page in another language does not mean that it would suitable for all language Wikipedias. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:35, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again @CNMall41! Thank you so much for clarifying. I'll continue to work on the entry to hopefully get it published. Paristolken (talk) 14:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marianne Lederer (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please also remove the external links before any resubmission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marianne Lederer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marianne Lederer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:47, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Greenman! Thank you for pointing out the flaws in my first draft. I have now reworked the article and double checked the sources and notability both according to bios of living people and to bios of academics, and of course. I have also removed the external links in a correct way I hope. Will submit it now for a new review and see what the next reviewer thinks! Thank you for your time and work, it's much appreciated. Paristolken (talk) 23:47, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Paristolken! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Link a draft page to WikiData, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marianne Lederer (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for creating this draft. The first two sections don't have enough inline citations - every statement needs to be referenced to a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marianne Lederer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marianne Lederer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 11:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marianne Lederer has been accepted

Marianne Lederer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 21:26, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ingeborg Gruenwald

Hello, Paristolken. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ingeborg Gruenwald, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ingeborg Gruenwald

Hello, Paristolken. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ingeborg Gruenwald".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:39, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]