User talk:Pinoybandwagon

Blocked

I have blocked you for abusive use of multiple accounts per Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pinoybandwagon. The length of the block depends on you sorting yourself out. Your talkpage suggests that you don't want to play by our rules so until you undertake to behave and ensure that image and article uploads are not copyvios and meet our inclusion thresholds. When you are ready for us to consider an unblock please post {{unblock|yourreasonhere}}

Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I hope you will not violate our policies anymore

Request handled by: MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 10:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I learned a lesson. I promise I will never do hoax articles again and I will never make usernames under me.}} Pinoybandwagon (talk) 08:22, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And what about uploading copyvios? Do you promise to follow WP:COPY? MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 10:34, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I promise to follow WP:COPY.Pinoybandwagon (talk) 10:37, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pinoybandwagon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not do anything wrong.

Decline reason:

See the comment at the bottom of Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pinoybandwagon. — Sandstein (talk) 06:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pinoybandwagon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I really promise to play by the rules this time.

Decline reason:

Improbable, since you've requested unblocking for both this account and your User:Map inc account. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock requests

While you are allowed to blank your talk page, please do not remove unblock requests if you are making additional unblock requests. Reviewing admins need to see who else has reviewed your request, and what their response was.

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pinoybandwagon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I really promise to play by the rules this time.

Decline reason:

Yeah, you promised that before and showed you were lying. — Yamla (talk) 13:36, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:107.9 U Radio.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:107.9 U Radio.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:31, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DZUR for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DZUR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DZUR until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hamham31 Heke!KushKush! 06:21, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DZUR for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DZUR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DZUR (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SeanJ 2007 (talk) 10:19, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:107.9 U Radio.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:107.9 U Radio.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]