Jump to content

User talk:Playlikeastar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A belated welcome!

[edit]
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Playlikeastar! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! 220 of ßorg 15:18, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhu Guruswamy (January 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please use actual titles in the reference. If he is indeed a major actor, please provide references talking about him (and not about the movies he has acted in). The references may be in regional languages as well from notable publications
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jupitus Smart 18:55, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Playlikeastar! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jupitus Smart 18:55, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir Jupitus Smart Thank you very much for your time for review , I have made the changes you sugested on

18:20, 03 February 2019 (IST)

please make some time for review thanks in advance waiting for hearing from you Playlikeastar

22:20, 26 February 2019 (IST)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhu Guruswamy (September 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QueerEcofeminist was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please remove all the self-published sources, add more reliable sources, some more content on how they are notable would help. thanks
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:57, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Did you send me an email?

[edit]

Did you send me an email? I don't check my email often and I prefer to keep most discussions transparent. Feel free to respond below. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 08:28, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

copy of the email for transparency

Hi Sir/Madam,

There is not even a single document which is self-published sources There is not even a single document which is not reliable sources I have referred other wiki pages where they ave used the same type of sources and document please help me to complete my work. It has been 1 + years since I am working on this document. I have done extensive research on this page where we have roughly 17en references. Can you please help me complete this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Madhu_Guruswamy


Playlikeasta 12:38, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhu Guruswamy (February 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Praxidicae (talk) 14:47, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dia (film) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Dia (film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JK (talk) 14:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

[edit]

Please do not directly copy copyrighted content onto Wikipedia such as the plot on the Dia (film) article. Repeated violations will result in a block. Atlantic306 (talk) 15:23, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dia (film) (February 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Atlantic306 was:
Revdel needs to be carried out first by an admin
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Atlantic306 (talk) 15:28, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dia (film) (February 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAviator was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
WikiAviator (talk) 11:15, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dia (film) has been accepted

[edit]
Dia (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 15:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Kannada films of 2020, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Action and Horror (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhu Guruswamy (March 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by AngusWOOF was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No improvement since previous submission.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:11, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Madhu Guruswamy

[edit]

Draft:Madhu Guruswamy, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Madhu Guruswamy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Madhu Guruswamy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:14, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Draft:Madhu Guruswamy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Removal of declines and rejection notices is considered WP:GAMING the system and will not be tolerated. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:01, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Shivaji-Surathkal-The-Case-Of-Ranagiri-Rahasya1.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Shivaji-Surathkal-The-Case-Of-Ranagiri-Rahasya1.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:00, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Master (2020 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Panda619 (talk) 20:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Veera Kannadiga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chakri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Amma Nanna O Tamila Ammayi into Maurya (film). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 20:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GRASP (object-oriented design), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Command (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help

[edit]

Hello, there. Greetings of the day. Need your help on creation of a Kannada movie page here. Expecting a quick response

With regards, Akilamano --Akilamano (talk) 14:34, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help

[edit]

Thank you so much for your quick response. Can we connect over an email, pls? Here's my email ID: akilamano6@gmail.com

Expecting a quick response

With regards, Akilamano --Akilamano (talk) 11:19, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Akilamano, 

I prefer to keep most discussions transparent. Feel free to respond below. --  Playlikeastar(talk) 19:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hello,
I have seen you contributing many movie article and software-related pages. Can you suggest me how can we write an article related to Kannada movie? What are the steps to be followed to create a good article? I want to be wiki contributed.
Thank you
--Akilamano (talk) 06:16, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

777 charlie moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, 777 charlie, has raised Sockpuppetry and/or conflict of interest suspicion as discussed at Special:PermanentLink/968184488#777_Charlie. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources; see WP:42. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace to enforce an independent review. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

If you are being compensated for this contribution, or have any connection to the subject, you are required to disclose this openly or risk being blocked from editing (see WP:PAID and WP:MEAT). ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:19, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Balaji Manohar

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Balaji Manohar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. A. Shohag 07:08, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article Balaji_Manohar

[edit]

The article you just created about an living people doesn't have enough verifiable sources. The 'Times of India' is a reliable source but the refereed pages are not verifiable. So I nominated it for deletion. If you think I did wrong, then talk. Thanks. A. Shohag 07:11, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Shiva Rajkumar does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
exclamation mark  Your edit summary usage is less than 5%, per this. Regards, 220 of ßorg 15:25, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 777 charlie (October 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LeoFrank was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See [this]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— LeoFrank  Talk 18:00, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hero

[edit]

I moved the article you created to Draft:Hero (2021 film) as it was badly undersourced. Filmibeat is not considered a reliable source, thus you only had one usable source included in the article. Please find more reliable sources for everything you have added, add them to the article and then submit the article for creation. Let me know if you have any questions! BOVINEBOY2008 10:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hero (2021 film) (January 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 2pou was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Every reference is a trailer announcement, and they all amount to one primary source promoting the upcoming release of a film. The fact that it was filmed during COVID with 24 members has potential, but it is coming from a direct quote (primary source). Recommend seeking more sources reporting on the filming from an outside perspective; otherwise, wait for reviews to come out upon its release to meet WP:NFILM (film notability requirements).
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
2pou (talk) 00:47, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Harikathe Alla Giri Kathe moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Harikathe Alla Giri Kathe, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 13:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Petromax (2021 film)

[edit]
Notice

The article Petromax (2021 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable future film, created too early fails WP:NFF. Should have been drafted until release.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Madhu Guruswamy

[edit]

Hello, Playlikeastar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Madhu Guruswamy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dab pages

[edit]

Re Kuyulu etc: a disambiguation page is a disambiguation page, and not a stub. It should have no incoming links, so the "Orphan" tag is irrelevant. Thanks. PamD 10:26, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

[edit]

Thank you so much for taking time to clean up and edit the article Varlam Urdia. Iberieli (talk) 13:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I'm not sure your replacement of André Collet with André Collet was helpful. Is the change according to the style guide? I admit ignorance. Can you clarify? Thank you. Trilotat (talk) 14:00, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging pages for deletion

[edit]

Hello, Playlikeastar,

Just a reminder that any time you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/CFD/TFD/etc.), you need to inform the page creator of this tagging. You should also mention the deletion tagging in the edit summary. I recommend you use Twinkle because the program will automatically post a talk page notice when you tag a page for deletion after you set up your Preferences to "Notify creator". Please try to do this consistently, editors need to know when and why their page creations have been tagged for deletion. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 03:42, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hero (2021 film) (March 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Hero (2021 film) instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:777 charlie

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Playlikeastar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:777 charlie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Llywrch/List of Roman governors of Hispania Tarraconensis

[edit]

Please do not edit pages in a user's private space. Of course it is an orphan, uncategorized, & without sources. This is one of several drafts in my private user space that is not intended for public use. Because of your unwanted edits I have lost information I had spent a couple of hours work collecting & correcting material. And due to demands on my time as a parent & holding down a full time job, I don't know when I'll be able to recover the information you caused me to lose. -- llywrch (talk) 07:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alexey Vaulin

[edit]

Hello Playlikeastar,

Thank you for your edits. You added “orphan tag” to article Alexey Vaulin. Article have sources and links, but this article is translate from Russian Wikipedia. Russian article is not a "orphan". Unfortunality I am not found any sources from English Wikipedia. Give me advise, please. --Sergey761 (talk) 01:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing news 2021 #2

[edit]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

Junior contributors comment completion rate across all participating Wikipedias
When newcomers had the Reply tool and tried to post on a talk page, they were more successful at posting a comment. (Source)

Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.

The key results were:

  • Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
  • The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.

These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.

Looking ahead

The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.

The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.

You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Harikathe Alla Giri Kathe

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Playlikeastar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harikathe Alla Giri Kathe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request

[edit]

Kichchu needs an article.[1][2][3][4][5] DareshMohan (talk) 09:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing newsletter 2022 – #1

[edit]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for the multilingual newsletter • Local subscription list

New editors were more successful with this new tool.

The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at most WMF-hosted wikis. You can join the discussion about this tool for the English Wikipedia is at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Enabling the New Topic Tool by default. You will be able to turn it off in the tool or at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

The Editing team plans to change the appearance of talk pages. These are separate from the changes made by the mw:Desktop improvements project and will appear in both Vector 2010 and Vector 2022. The goal is to add some information and make discussions look visibly different from encyclopedia articles. You can see some ideas at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project#Prototype Ready for Feedback.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

23:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Editing news 2022 #2

[edit]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Graph showing 90-minute response time without the new tool and 39-minute response time with the tool
The [subscribe] button shortens response times.

The new [subscribe] button notifies people when someone replies to their comments. It helps newcomers get answers to their questions. People reply sooner. You can read the report. The Editing team is turning this tool on for everyone. You will be able to turn it off in your preferences.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing news 2023 #1

[edit]

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

This newsletter includes two key updates about the Editing team's work:

  1. The Editing team will finish adding new features to the Talk pages project and deploy it.
  2. They are beginning a new project, Edit check.

Talk pages project

Screenshot showing the talk page design changes that are currently available as beta features at all Wikimedia wikis. These features include information about the number of people and comments within each discussion.
Some of the upcoming changes

The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the Talk pages project. Nearly all new features are available now in the Beta Feature for Discussion tools.

It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "Add topic" button. You will be able to turn them off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Please tell them what you think.

Daily edit completion rate by test group: DiscussionTools (test group) and MobileFrontend overlay (control group)

An A/B test for Discussion tools on the mobile site has finished. Editors were more successful with Discussion tools. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.

New Project: Edit Check

The Editing team is beginning a project to help new editors of Wikipedia. It will help people identify some problems before they click "Publish changes". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please watch that page for more information. You can join a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

[edit]
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/kannada/movie-reviews/kichchu/movie-review/64026596.cms
  2. ^ https://www.newindianexpress.com/entertainment/review/2018/may/05/kicchu-movie-review-lofty-message-in-a-stretched-film-1810267.html
  3. ^ https://www.deccanherald.com/national/kicchu-review-good-intentions-flat-emotions-668254.html
  4. ^ https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/kannada/movies/news/sudeep-on-dhruva-sharmas-film-kichchu/articleshow/63999153.cms
  5. ^ https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/kannada/movies/news/kichchu-is-about-dhruva-but-he-is-not-around-to-see-it-pradeep-raj/articleshow/64013766.cms
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Playlikeastar&oldid=1221945157"