User talk:Prince of Erebor

I did not receive any messages from
2015 to 2021.
The talk archives begin from 2022:

2022—2024

Happy New Year, Prince of Erebor!

Happy New Year!

Prince of Erebor,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 20:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 20:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, D.18th! Wishing you a happy and prosperous new year too!!! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 12:10, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Papa (2024 film)

On 2 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Papa (2024 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that multiple scenes in Papa feature cotton-tree flowers, even though it was not scripted and the falling cotton simply kept drifting into the shot? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Papa (2024 film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Papa (2024 film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 12:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A WAM Barnstar for you!

	Wikipedia Asian Month 2024 contest
	Prince of Erebor Thank you for your additions in Wikipedia Asian Month 2024. 28 of your articles have been accepted. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 18:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, ZI Jony!! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 18:49, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome! Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 18:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Blossoms Under Somewhere

On 8 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Blossoms Under Somewhere, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the director-screenwriter of Blossoms Under Somewhere joined Telegram groups that sell used lingerie to conduct field research? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Blossoms Under Somewhere. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Blossoms Under Somewhere), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 12:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Witch (TV series)

I went ahead and published The Witch (TV series) to avoid any further delay. So I hope you don't consider this rude. I wouldn't be offended if someone did similar to a draft I marked for review for similar technical reasons. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 23:39, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey D, sorry, but I do feel that way. I clearly marked the draft as under review, and the notice allowed for a 12-hour window for the review process. It was only less than two hours after the redirect page sharing the same article title in the mainspace was deleted before I could proceed with the review. I do not see any actual delays here, nor any urgency to move an upcoming television series to mainspace in such a short time. I even did some copyediting and expanded the article during the process, so I see no reason why this review should not be counted under my belt. If you had done so after 12 hours, I would be really grateful and have appreciated your assistance, but it is only 3:10 now. I really do not see any legitimate reason for this to happen. Please avoid taking over others' reviews until the 12-hour period has ended. —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 03:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright and noted that. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 07:46, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind to take a look at this draft I made? I'll appreciate your review. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 07:56, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey D, I have moved the draft to mainspace. Thanks for putting together the article! (I am a huge fan of the 2007 original!) —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 13:13, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my! For real? Now I'm gonna watch original film before watching the South Korean remake. Thanks a lot! 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 14:48, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@D.18th: Yes, the original film has a straightforward plot but a really touching ending, and its theme song is definitely worth looping! I hope you enjoy both films! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 08:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Need Help With An Article

Hi Prince Erebor, I hope you’re doing well. I really appreciate the review you wrote on the article I submitted. From your feedback, it seems the main issue with the article is the references I’ve included. Most of the sources I was able to find relevant to the subject are from Baidu Baike. I’ll work on finding more reliable and diverse sources to improve the article. I would truly appreciate your assistance and guidance in making it strong enough for publication. Thank you so much for your time and support! CHIBEZA17 (talk) 10:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey CHIBEZA17, that is right. Most of the sources currently in the draft are either primary sources related to the awards or companies associated with the topic, or they come from Baidu Baike, which is not a reliable source. You might try looking for news articles or book coverage on the subject. Feel free to reach out to me here once you have completed the rewrite. I would be happy to take a look. —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 16:24, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Prince of Erebor, i have made the edits to the article, if you have the time you can review the draft. will very much appreciate your feedback. CHIBEZA17 (talk) 13:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi CHIBEZA17, I took a look at the first ten sources of the article, and I do not believe the issues with the previous nomination have been resolved. All sources except for source 2 focus on Duan's company or the awards she received, with minimal mention of her, while Source 2 is an WP:INTERVIEW. Besides, much of the article is unsourced. (Please see WP:INLINE) If these are the best media coverage available for the subject, I am concerned that she may not have enough notability for a Wikipedia article at this time. —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 14:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		The Chinese Barnstar
		For the great dedication made towards Chinese-related articles, I am much impressed by your efforts. Thank you. Ilovefood123123 (talk) 14:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		For preventing the deletion of Hong Nga Court by finding related sources and proving its notability. Thank you. Ilovefood123123 (talk) 14:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OMG a double barnstar!!! Thank you so much for not just one but two barnstars, Ilovefood123123! Your kind words truly light me up. I am also impressed by your efforts so far, especially the articles related to the University of Hong Kong. You know I am actually a member of Hornell Hall, and I feel a bit ashamed that I have never considered writing an article for my hall after seeing your well-composed Eliot Hall and May Hall. Thanks again, and I am really looking forward to your amazing articles about Hong Kong as well! Happy editing!! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 16:36, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your kind words and appreciation on my work. I might see if I could create a new article for your hall, which of course you would be much more familiar with and would be best if you could ensure that the information I scavenge are up to date and correct. Ilovefood123123 (talk) 16:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ilovefood123123, well, I do not have any books about the history of HKU, so if I were to write about it, I would probably need to rely solely on online resources as well. If you are interested and have the time to write it, I would be very excited to see your work! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 17:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Certainly Ilovefood123123 (talk) 14:13, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Miss Shampoo

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Miss Shampoo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 09:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Miss Shampoo

The article Miss Shampoo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Miss Shampoo for comments about the article, and Talk:Miss Shampoo/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 18:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your detailed review of the article, Kusma! Regarding Story in Taipei, I know it is Oscar Chiu's debut role, but actually I only wrote the article for him while getting rid of red links for The Lyricist Wannabe. I have not watched the film yet, so I am certainly not confident in writing about it at this point. I may watch it when I have the time, and if I enjoy it, I will definitely do my best to expand on it! Cheers!! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 19:33, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Last Song for You

On 22 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Last Song for You, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that lead actor Ian Chan also composed, arranged, and performed the interlude for Last Song for You? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Last Song for You. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Last Song for You), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nana (entertainer, born 2001)

Could you please review this: Draft:Nana (entertainer, born 2001) Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 07:46, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Btspurplegalaxy, I believe this is the first time we have a conversation, so nice to meet you! I reviewed the article and have some reservations about whether the subject currently has enough individual notability for a standalone article. She has not made her solo debut, and her appearances on television shows like Queendom Puzzle are alongside her groupmates, which does not demonstrate sufficient individual notability. I know she has appeared in a couple of web series, but none of those have standalone articles at this time, which might suggest only a very marginal pass on notability. But since she has not made any additional appearances since the article's AFD in September 2024, which resulted in a redirect, and given that the consensus during that discussion was that her appearances were still insufficient for individual notability, I am afraid there are not enough new individual activities to override that conclusion just yet. I would be happy to accept the draft if she releases a solo single or appears in a few more notable TV series individually in the near future! Cheers and happy editing! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 08:22, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to review it—I really appreciate your feedback. I'll see what I can do with the draft moving forward, considering that Nana isn't currently engaged in solo activities. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 23:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, Btspurplegalaxy! I appreciate the effort you have put into this article too (as well as so many other K-pop articles). It is definitely not about your editing; the issue is with notability that traps the article in draftspace. In the meantime, perhaps we can sit back and wait for Nana to advance her own career to a point where she achieves sufficient individual notability. Cheers! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 14:05, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]