User talk:Qbli2mHd
๐ listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ๐. Since you had some involvement with the ๐ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). The Banner talk 23:29, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
๐ซ listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ๐ซ. Since you had some involvement with the ๐ซ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). The Banner talk 23:30, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
๐ค listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ๐ค. Since you had some involvement with the ๐ค redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). The Banner talk 23:31, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
๐ listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ๐. Since you had some involvement with the ๐ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). The Banner talk 23:33, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Irreligion by country
[edit]It would make things a lot easier if you used an edit summary. All you did was change the date to 2012 and the % numbers. It looks like the usual religious POV stuff that goes on and is impossible to tell that there has been any updates in the source. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 15:54, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't use the edit summary therefore outdated numbers should stay? What does "impossible to tell that there has been any updates in the source" mean? Qbli2mHd (talk) 16:12, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- I never said that the outdated figures should stay the same. The reference says that it was accessed in 2011 but if the numbers changed when you checked them it access date should have been changed as well. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 22:17, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- I was just trying to find a way to add new countries in the list without breaking the sorting order and decided to save the intermediate result. Qbli2mHd (talk) 15:00, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
- I never said that the outdated figures should stay the same. The reference says that it was accessed in 2011 but if the numbers changed when you checked them it access date should have been changed as well. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 22:17, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Lombardy-Venetia flag
[edit]I agree; Daufer (talk) 22:26, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Evolutionary origin of religions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Continuity (check to confirmย |ย fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQย โข Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Order of Prince Henry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen of the Netherlands (check to confirmย |ย fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQย โข Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Qbli2mHd. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Qbli2mHd. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Qbli2mHd. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)