User talk:QwertyZ34

Welcome!

Hi QwertyZ34! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Jay8g [V•T•E] 22:14, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

January 2025

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 22:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, i will be more concentrated on the links this time ! Thanks for your warning. QwertyZ34 (talk) 14:28, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 21:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I understand for the "Borders of China" article, but, for the "Democratic Republic of Congo" article, this time, I don’t understand why my edit got reverted since it’s adding one information. It will be great if you answer. Thank you. QwertyZ34 (talk) 21:54, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Because you thanked me

QwertyZ34, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...  YOU'RE WELCOME! It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! DANGA14talk

22:07, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi QwertyZ34. Thank you for your work on Shodoba. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for adding this jamoat; as an inhabited place it is likely to be notable. It would be great to expand it, perhaps with information including its coordinates.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 20:00, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi QwertyZ34. Thank you for your work on Okoloti. Another editor, Kudpung, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

please expand this article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:21, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for informing me, unfortunately, I created this article only because it was red linked on a list, I don’t have particulary a project to improve it. You are welcome. QwertyZ34 (talk) 12:26, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi QwertyZ34. Thank you for your work on Ohamaremba. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

geonames.org is a user-editable database and hence isn't considered to be WP:RS. Please add a good source for the settlement.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:06, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Guinea-Bissau (disambiguation)

Hello QwertyZ34, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Guinea-Bissau (disambiguation), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guinea-Bissau (disambiguation).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thanks for your help Avalotto (talk) 17:31, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, @Avalotto, it’s a pleasure helping Wikipedia; to be an good encyclopedia, sourced, and detailled. QwertyZ34 (talk) 20:51, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Ces messieurs de la gâchette moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ces messieurs de la gâchette. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:30, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for your action. I will improve it. QwertyZ34 (talk) 20:07, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

March 2025

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Fram (talk) 14:59, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. Fram (talk) 07:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Fram, sorry for any inconvenience I made on Wikipedia; I didn't wanted to, I realised these sources aren't reliable. I found, for the Indian--Guntur district related articles, this source (which mentions all the villages in Guntur district):. For the scientifics--vine species articles, @Relativity added a reliable source to Passiflora pilosicorona, I think its reliable, since you haven't drafted the article. Please, tell me if the sources listed below, are reliable, and sufficient for their corresponding article. Happy editing to you. QwertyZ34 (talk) 15:38, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

I doubt that that source about the villages is actually a reliable source, but in any case all it does is give a name, it gives no information at all, so you can't base an article on it. Fram (talk) 15:48, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

The source will be relied to ex: Karlapudi is a village in Guntur district | making the source actually reliable to the sentence, since its content lists all the villages in Guntur district. QwertyZ34 (talk) 15:54, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

I don't know what you think, but I highly think that the articles should not be deleted/drafted, after this discussion. QwertyZ34 (talk) 15:36, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Literally all you have is "7 Karlapudi". That's it. In what way is that sufficient to write an article? Please see WP:GNG and the need for indepth sources about the subject. Fram (talk) 15:48, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

First of all, this source mention ALL the villages of Guntur district. These articles are stub and don't need to have too much sources. QwertyZ34 (talk) 15:59, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Feel free to use the WP:AFC process to get an idea how others feel about these. And no, a source which lists all villages without further information about them is not an indepth source for this or that village, just like a telephone directory isn't an indepth source for any one person in it. There is no exception for stubs with regards to sourcing, I don't know where you got that idea. Fram (talk) 16:27, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I will search for better, in depth sources. QwertyZ34 (talk) 16:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

References

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi QwertyZ34. Thank you for your work on Passiflora pilosicorona. Another editor, Relativity, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your submission! I have added a citation to the article. In the future, please cite any content that would probably be challenged. Cheers :)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Relativity}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

‍Relativity ⚡️ 00:57, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

@Relativity: Hello, thanks for cheering me ! And also thanks for adding a citation; I will add similar citations to every article I recently created. You are welcome. QwertyZ34 (talk) 06:48, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Copy-paste

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to plant articles. However, please be more careful when copy-pasting the bottom parts of the pages. You are copy-pasting both the WP:SORTKEY in Category:Passiflora and the Wikidata identifiers in the taxonbar for Passiflora harlingii (Q1369986). JTtheOG (talk) 01:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I am sorry for any inconvenience I made—produced. I will be more attentive to the next articles I’ll create. Thanks and you are welcome. QwertyZ34 (talk) 06:49, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

2025 March

@QwertyZ34 I saw you edited Draft: A.R. Sindhu. Can you please edit further with sources to give the draft final shape? XYZ 250706 (talk) 13:45, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Sorry but, I probably won’t be able to to help this article. QwertyZ34 (talk) 11:14, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Verdun, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nancy and Treaty of Münster.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Austrian Netherlands

added a link pointing to United Provinces

Cousances-les-Forges

added a link pointing to Narcy

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kingdom of Montenegro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Press.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Ces messieurs de la gâchette moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ces messieurs de la gâchette. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and in particular, the article needs at least two and preferably three reliable independent sources with significant coverage of the subject. There's useful information about how to choose good sources and avoid bad sources here. For films, full length reviews by respected critics are a good source for establishing notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SunloungerFrog (talk) 18:16, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Sources

Hello. Your edit summary at Liechtenstein was puzzling. If you have sources, you ought to cite them in the article. Your comment implies an expectation that a reader who wants a source for information in the article where one isn't given is going to pull up the page's history and find the edit where the info was added to see if the contributor had offered to supply a source on request. Can you clarify? Largoplazo (talk) 12:50, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I thought that citing a source in the footnote would be unnecessary; I realised that it is necessary. Sorry for the confusion, I will add sources. QwertyZ34 (talk) 15:50, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ohamaremba

Hello, QwertyZ34,

Thank you for creating Ohamaremba.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

WP policy WP:NPLACE requires more sources to demonstrate that the place has books/articles talking about the place. Article currently does not have sufficient sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noleander (talk) 18:21, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello! I will try to improve this article by respecting Wikipedia policies. Thanks for remembering me! QwertyZ34 (talk) 18:49, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

ChatGPT "sources"

Please do not add sources suggested by chatbots without checking them first, like you did here: diff. They contain 404s. Please revert your changes and read the sources you use to verify the content before re-adding them. Thanks. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 19:20, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, I will start to do this now; thanks. QwertyZ34 (talk) 19:27, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Western Bloc

added links pointing to Unipolar and Transatlantic

Belgium

added a link pointing to Canache

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

BLAR notice

Hi there. While reviewing new pages, I noticed that a page you created, Place Saint-Denis, does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines as a standalone article. As an alternative to deletion, I've redirected it to Liège#Main_sights. If you disagree, feel free to revert my redirect and we can proceed to a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. (If you reply to me here, please ping me as I am not watching this page.) Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:28, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, sorry if I see this message late; thanks for your decision. It is important to respect Wikipedia policies. QwertyZ34 (talk) 15:27, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uzbekistan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Diversification and Influence.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Akçalı, Milas moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Akçalı, Milas. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and in particular, I cannot load the single source [1] for verification. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SunloungerFrog (talk) 10:47, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I will try to improve this article, thanks for your decision. QwertyZ34 (talk) 20:39, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Ngong

Please refrain from hijacking pages, as you did with Ngong. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Please also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. I moved your material from Ngong to Ngong, Cameroon. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:45, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, I wanted to make this article because it was redlinked QwertyZ34 (talk) 19:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Copying/translating content within Wikipedias requires attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Guayaquil you included material translated from the Spanish Wikipedia. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. Attribution is provided by saying in your edit summary that the material was copied, and where you got it. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying between Wikipedias in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:37, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi, sorry, I forgot to attribute QwertyZ34 (talk) 19:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Slovakia. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 19:51, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Oh, my bad! I haven’t realised that it was a mirror source; thanks for warning me from this. QwertyZ34 (talk) 19:54, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Recognizing reliable sources

You recently cited World Population Review here. It is self-published, so it is not a reliable source. It has been discussed several times before at the reliable sources noticeboard:

• March 2019
• August 2019
• July 2022
• August 2023
• September 2023

Do not cite it. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:56, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, I will not cite this non-reliable source anymore! Anyways, I found sources stating that Dhaka is the 9th most populous city and not the eighth in List of largest cities; the following sources were copied in the article: QwertyZ34 (talk) 11:25, 10 June 2025 (UTC)