User talk:ReclaimEC1

Welcome!

Hello, ReclaimEC1!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, _saluere, Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs^⚔ 16:41, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Frederick Robinson (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cinder painter was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas Frederick Robinson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cinder painter (talk) 10:56, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ReclaimEC1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cinder painter (talk) 10:56, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaron D'Souza (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heavy Grasshopper was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

These sources are not independent of the subject. They are published by organisations he is affiliated with, or else they are routine reportings of election results. We need independent, reliable sources with significant coverage of him in order to show notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aaron D'Souza and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Heavy Grasshopper (talk) 15:53, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why AfD Mornflake?

Hi, ReclaimEC1. I am curious about this edit that you made to the Mornflake article. You made it the day after I tagged and proposed deletion of an article (Guild of Young Freemen) that you had edited extensively, after which I made a small update to the Mornflake article, and you have then promptly added the same tags and proposed deletion of it. Given your previous edit history has been entirely focused on City of London-related matters, it seems strange that your first and only AfD proposal should target that particular article. Please explain. Paul W (talk) 17:56, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "ReclaimEC1", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because Reclaim EC1 says "ReclaimEC1 is a collaborative editorial project led by a group of journalists and researchers". If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. A username must represent an individual person - not "a group of journalists and researchers" Paul W (talk) 22:23, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you that is most helpful, apologies. Still new to all of it. ReclaimEC1 (talk) 22:26, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ArachnidInner. An edit that you recently made to Guild of Young Freemen seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Hey there, please specify a cadet unit. Different guilds support different units. (Arachnid's userpage | what did I do now) 15:04, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks it wasn’t my page I was just trying to improve it. ReclaimEC1 (talk) 13:07, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fraser Peck for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fraser Peck, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fraser Peck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Financial Services Group of Livery Companies (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All of these references are 404ing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Financial Services Group of Livery Companies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 14:17, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. PhilKnight (talk) 23:28, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]