User talk:Robibrad

Welcome!

Hello, Robibrad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flex 20:10, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of http://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk and http://www.theologicalstudies.org.uk external links

Hi Robibrad. I hope you're enjoying Wikipedia. I've noticed your editing seems to consist of adding external links to websites you are the webmaster of. While we appreciate efforts to provide good resources we do ask people not to add external links to websites they are connected with directly to articles. If you believe a link to your website is an appropriate link for an article please propose it on the talk page and let unaffiliated editors decide whether it should be added. See our external links and conflict of interest guidelines and our What Wikipedia is not policy for more details. I'd also like to encourage you to add content to our articles, not just links to other sites. We're trying to build a GFDL encyclopedia so external links are some of the least useful additions - it would be great if you could use your expertise to help improve the article texts instead. If you have any questions please feel free to leave a message here or at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. -- SiobhanHansa 13:38, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vox Evangelica (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Endrabcwizart was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vox Evangelica and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Endrabcwizart (talk) 16:26, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robibrad! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Endrabcwizart (talk) 16:26, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]