User talk:Rodog2007

Speedy deletion nomination of Leroy McClure Jr

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Leroy McClure Jr, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Triple A Academy moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Triple A Academy. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Darjean

Hello, Rodog2007. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page John Darjean, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jay8g [V•T•E] 08:19, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. I am trying to comply with the guidelines. If you believe any content I have contributed appears to advertise, publicize, or promotional, please let me know what parts so i can change it. I have ensured that all information provided is publicly available online. Rodog2007 (talk) 01:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I was just dropping by to leave you a similar note discussing promotional editing. Please be conscious of Wikipedia's foundational pillars, including that Wikipedia is written in a neutral point of view. The following sentences from the John Darjean article are an example of writing that does not conform to a neutral point of view and encyclopedic tone: He developed a passion for baseball from a young age, playing the sport throughout his childhood. Darjean went on to attend Dallas Baptist University in Dallas, Texas, where his baseball talent continued to shine. Let me know if you have any follow-up questions. If you do, remember to ping me by typing {{ping|Significa liberdade}}. This will ensure I am notified of your reply. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:42, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for the insight. I have removed uncited statements and added reliable sources. Would you mind reviewing the page before I submit it for review? Rodog2007 (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User page

The page is allowed to be in user categories that you find under the Category:Wikipedians tree, because those are meant for user pages. It isn't allowed to be in mainspace categories that would mix it with actual articles. Bearcat (talk) 20:39, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hi Rodog2007! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:38, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

John Darjean moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to John Darjean. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text and thus may include incorrect information (see WP:LLM). I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Triple A Academy

Hello, Rodog2007. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Triple A Academy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:11, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Triple A Academy

Hello, Rodog2007. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Triple A Academy".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:24, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]