User talk:Shaykea

Speedy deletion nomination of Shaykea

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Shaykea, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 14:22, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shaykea

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Shaykea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:23, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Shaykea. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:24, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sixgill logo 2020.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sixgill logo 2020.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tzahi (Zack) Weisfeld

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tzahi (Zack) Weisfeld, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 15:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paid contributions

To avoid any ambiguity, please declare that you are NOT paid when you make substantial edits to a page or create a new draft. The easiest way would be by putting something on your user page saying "I have been paid to edit x, y, and z, and nothing else." Just be sure to update the list before editing any page you are or have been paid to edit.

If you do not, editors may - rightly or wrongly - assume you have been paid to edit more than you admit to when they see that you have already been paid to edit at least one article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:42, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you davidwr for your remarks. I will Pay Attention to it in the future Shaykea (talk) 16:50, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shaykea

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shaykea, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 17:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello Shaykea. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Tzahi (Zack) Weisfeld, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Shaykea. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Shaykea|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 02:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: See the #Paid contributions discussion above and the subsequent paid disclosure notice regarding one - and only one - article at User:Shaykea. I think it's clear that this editor is saying, by making that list after I requested it and not including Tzahi (Zack) Weisfeld in the list, that he has not been paid to edit it. Also, he explicitly denied being paid to edit it on that article's talk page. Now, as I said on the same talk page, in my opinion, the page is in that grey area where editors may disagree about whether it qualifies for speedy deletion or not. I happen to think it is close to but not over the line. You disagree. That is fair. I hope a non-involved administrator checks the edit history and talk page history before deciding. I will not remove that speedy deletion template a second time, that would be borderline if not actual edit-warring. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:16, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Davidwr then they should have no trouble explaining this ticket, specifically the third e-mail. Praxidicae (talk) 00:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[[Praxidicae [[davidwr Thank you for all your comments. As I have mentioned before, I have not recived payment for writing about Zack Wiesfled. I reached Intel for reciving the rights of usage in Zack wiesfeld picture. As a payed contributer, I have no problem to declare about COI. This is not the case in that matter. I will be happy to continue to work on this article, and re-write it to amply Wikipedia stadarts. I wm sorry for all the hussle and comfuision which my actions casued.Shaykea (talk) 07:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tzahi (Zack) Weisfeld for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tzahi (Zack) Weisfeld is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tzahi (Zack) Weisfeld until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TomStar81 (Talk) 11:10, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shamir Optical Industry moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shamir Optical Industry, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

You have declared COI.you may not edit this in main space, nor may you move it to main spaceFiddle Faddle 16:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:Timtrent for your comments. I translated this article from the Hebrew version, and most of the references in this article are taken from there.

The great majority of the references are from reliable sources such Haartez, Old newspapers snips from the archive of the National Library of Israel and other intranational news.

Some of the references I could not find any citation from credible sources, And I hoped the community will help with it. Therefore I suggest to put "citation needed" near the fields where the reliable sources should be preform.Shaykea (talk)

I understand that it is a translated aticle. My sole interest in the article was in peventing COI from appearing in mainspace unreviewed. You may obviousy edit and improve the draft Fiddle Faddle 23:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Oh I see User:Timtrent. Thank you for that. I will keep improve the article and send it through the proper channels.Shaykea (talk) 23:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shamir Optical Industry has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shamir Optical Industry. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shamir Optical Industry has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shamir Optical Industry. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shamir Optical Industry (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject. Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shamir Optical Industry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shamir Optical Industry, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shaykea! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shamir Optical Industry (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

This draft is not very different from the version that was declined five months ago. It still does not establish corporate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shamir Optical Industry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shamir Optical Industry, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:The contentor per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The contentor. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 10:51, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]