User talk:ShowmikKM

This is ShowmikKM's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Not a Fiction (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kovcszaln6 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Source 4 doesn't verify everything in the Plot section. Either find reliable sources that verify those, or remove those. Thanks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Not a Fiction and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kovcszaln6 (talk) 10:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ShowmikKM! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kovcszaln6 (talk) 10:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Not a Fiction has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Not a Fiction. Thanks! Kovcszaln6 (talk) 14:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your message. I have added a new sentence in the plot. The sentence has been taken from this part of the 1st source.

""The film addresses the issue of an extrajudicial killing case, a harsh reality that unfolds worldwide. It was captured in a single continuous take, with no breaks or interruptions during filming. The ambient sound played a crucial role in conveying the essence of the film," explained Cju."" ShowmikKM (talk) 14:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Not a Fiction has been accepted

Not a Fiction, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kovcszaln6 (talk) 15:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ehsanul Haque Babu (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ehsanul Haque Babu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 18:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shomy Hasan Chowdhury (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shomy Hasan Chowdhury and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 10:48, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Awareness 360 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Awareness 360. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Gheus (talk) 10:49, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, ShowmikKM. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Gheus (talk) 10:50, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Declare any connection

Hello ShowmikKM. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Ehsanul Haque Babu, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ShowmikKM. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ShowmikKM|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:32, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Worldbruce,

Thanks for your message. I just want to make it clear that I’m not a paid editor, and I haven’t received any money or reward for any of my edits. I’m simply a volunteer who enjoys contributing to Wikipedia. I understand that paid editing needs to be disclosed, but in my case, there’s nothing.

I’m a big fan of movies. Recently, I watched a Bangladeshi film called Rehana Maryam Noor. After watching it, I got really interested and started reading more about it. I found out that in 2021, it was selected for the Un Certain Regard section at the Cannes Film Festival—the first time any film from Bangladesh made it into that category. I thought that was a big achievement.

While googling more about the film, I came across some news articles and interviews. That’s when I noticed that the producer of the film, Ehsanul Haque Babu, didn’t have a Wikipedia page—even though his name showed up in many reliable sources. So I thought it might be worth trying to create a page about him, since he seems to be a notable figure in the film industry.

I only wanted to help improve Wikipedia by adding information about someone who played a key role in a notable film along with others. But I understand your concern, and I really appreciate that you reached out. If there’s anything I did wrong or could do better, I’m happy to learn and improve.

Thanks again for your time.

Best regards,

ShowmikKM ShowmikKM (talk) 19:53, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]