Jump to content

User talk:Skeptical1800

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Skeptical1800! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 22:30, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Armeno-Phrygian languages
added a link pointing to Hittite
Armeno-Phrygians
added a link pointing to Hittite

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hi,

Is there a reason you are deleting Kurdistan/Kurdistan Region in Urartu entry? You have done it twice.

I only reverted it once, actually. Another user reverted it previously. I explained why I reverted it in the edit summary: you removed sourced material with no explanation. To further clarify, you were engaging in Wikipedia:Disruptive editing that violates WP:Neutral point of view. The current terminology used for the geographic location of Urartu is sufficient. If you have any further issues, take it to Talk: Urartu, where the larger community can discuss.Skeptical1800 (talk) 17:32, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed I will. I did not delete any source material. That is incorrect. I just added "Kurdistan" which is as valid as a definition "Armanian highlands"

You did. You deleted the sourced mentioning of Ara. You rewrote a sentence and then moved a source to make it seem like it was citing your sentence re-write.Skeptical1800 (talk) 02:53, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Name of Armenia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hatti.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--><span
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diauehi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assyrian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Keep up the good work!
Codonified (talk) 20:30, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the Barnstar, Codonified! Skeptical1800 (talk) 21:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Minua (January 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 17:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Skeptical1800! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 17:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Minua

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Minua requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hema Mohanty (talk) 17:23, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Bogazicili (talk) 16:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User Conduct Dispute

[edit]

Pursuant to the resolving user conduct disputes, I want to go over my concerns about your conduct recently.

1) WP:Aspersions: Can you please stop making these types of aspersions?

  • and your edits clearly promote a personal bias [1]
  • User is showing inherent nationalistic bias.[2]
  • User is removing sourced material for no apparent reason other than supporting their own agenda and nationalistic biases. User is intentionally and knowingly distorting information, despite repeated alerts and warnings [3]

2) Misrepresentation of sources

3) Minor Edits

4) Wikipedia:Edit warring, WP:ONUS

Please review applicable WP:PAGs, such as above. Note that this is a contentious topic. See: Administrators' noticeboard topic Bogazicili (talk) 17:29, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My edits promote "nationalistic bias"? Ironic, considering the nature of this dispute (your intentional misrepresentation of quotes to support your own nationalistic bias).
How do I accept this dispute?Skeptical1800 (talk) 17:44, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The ones in green are things you said, they are your quotes. Bogazicili (talk) 17:48, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All true. You repeatedly leave out information, distort information, and cherrypick information to support whatever your agenda is.
Anyway, how do I accept this dispute?
Also, I'd appreciate if you stopped stalking me on here. It's strange.Skeptical1800 (talk) 17:53, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]