User talk:Skibidiohiorizz123

Hi welcome to my talk page. Post things to give me messages or what ever else you need here.

Your submission at Articles for creation: "Erm what the sigma" (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Brain rot. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:"Erm what the sigma" and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I want it to be deleted. To be honest, it would have been better to use a sandbox or making a text document as practice for writing wikipedia articles. Apologizes for any time wasted. Skibidiohiorizz123 (talk) 20:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Skibidiohiorizz123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to climate change, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 13:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I want to quit

I mentioned an issue with a controversial article. Now This moron Hob Gabling is being a little annoying rat and him and his little squad are harassing me on the talk page. I'm now considering quitting editing on wikipedia permanently, or at least for a long time after only holding this account for about a week. Skibidiohiorizz123 (talk) 20:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page is climate change denial and they are publicly humiliating me on purpose because I don't agree with them. Can a admin or something remove talk page or something for Hob Gabling especially. Skibidiohiorizz123 (talk) 20:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Rambling Rambler (talk) 21:36, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah why don't you ban them to. They called me nazi and are harassing me at this point. Skibidiohiorizz123 (talk) 23:36, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 21:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Skibidiohiorizz123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will no longer do anything related to climate change.

Decline reason:

"Rats like you should be exterminated off this site." You are completely unwelcome here now. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 01:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This entire website has never cared about anything it says it does. I have been entirely banned permanently for one talk page because some people escalated it. I'm so tired of these admins doing nothing when in the administrator noticeboard i'm being compared to catholics in nazi countries. I hope this website gets shut down.