User talk:Skinetchings

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Skinetchings, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Facta Concludentia (legal) to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

The Teahouse - ask Wikipedians for general editing help
Articles for Creation Help Desk - ask reviewers for draft article help
Creating your first article
Referencing for beginners
Wikipedia Manual of Style

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liance^talk 21:56, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Facta Concludentia (legal) (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Facta Concludentia (legal) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 21:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Skinetchings! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Liance^talk 21:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Facta Concludentia (legal)

Hello, Skinetchings. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Facta Concludentia (legal), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Princess Elizabeth Trough

Hello, Skinetchings. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Princess Elizabeth Trough, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to California Proposition 65 list of chemicals have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: California Proposition 65 list of chemicals was changed by Skinetchings (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916443 on 2025-04-21T16:54:52+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:54, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Scott's test

Thanks for adding new content at Scott's test. However, it is already discussed over at Cobalt(II) thiocyanate, so I've merge it over (to avoid duplication) and left a redirect to ensure that readers can find your contribution. Klbrain (talk) 12:08, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cindy Hendy (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Several of these sources are inappropriate for a BLP (the legal case, FBI). The rest are poor (all thats interesting/Oxygen, both non RS), or local news about her release. The Slow Death book is one good source, but that's really it. I also think this may be best covered alongside Ray's article, not separate. But mostly the problem is we only have one good source and this is a BLP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cindy Hendy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:31, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Oslo study

On 26 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oslo study, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Oslo study withheld treatment from 2,000 patients with syphilis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Oslo Study. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Oslo study), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]