User talk:Sofia Roberts

You wrote in Trader Joe's section: "Possibly because it sources from a wide variety of smaller suppliers than mainstream supermarkets, Trader Joe's does not always have all its products in stock, and customers do not expect to find the exact same store as last week. Indeed, that is part of the company's appeal."

We need citation for this comment or it will be deleted.

License tagging for Image:Ecotopia Emerging cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ecotopia Emerging cover.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:06, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

The Profits of Religion

It shouldn't be too hard to find references from critics who refer to the book as propaganda. I am not saying it is not propaganda - Sinclair is known as a propagandist, a muckraker. Still, I think the claim should be referenced - as all claims should (aside from plot summaries and so forth).Zigzig20s 13:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Cover of first edition of Penrod.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cover of first edition of Penrod.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clinical trial

Hello Sofia, I looked through the history of the article, and it doesn't seem as if there was any one primary contributor. Because this is a wiki, the article is open to further changes and hopefully improvements anyway. I agree with you that the article needs simplification, to make it more accessible to people who don't have any sort of medical or scientific background. I however disagree about splitting the article into layperson and expert versions. I feel that when trying to describe something complex on Wikipedia, it's important to keep both audiences in mind and explain terms and essential concepts as necessary. With the clinical trial article in particular, I think that ideally the introduction should be both shorter (e.g. less specific details about cancer studies) and broader (i.e. give a brief overview of the subject, with further details and development in the main body of the text). Please let me know what you think. Thanks for up the subject! --Kyoko 12:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Mammonart title page.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Mammonart title page.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Goose-step book cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Goose-step book cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Phantom Tollbooth rewrite

Sophia, I just wanted to say THANKS for the rewrite of The Phantom Tollbooth. It's been a mess for a long time and was really in need or your rewrite. Thanks again, and hope to see you again around the 'pedia. — Frecklefσσt | Talk 19:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sofia Roberts. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]