User talk:SublimeWik

An invite to join WikiProject Russia

Hi, you are cordially invited to join WikiProject Russia. We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Russia.
As you have shown an interest in [[Peter Lavelle]] we thought you might like to take an interest in this WikiProject.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project! --Russavia ^{I'm chanting as we speak} 18:01, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, SublimeWik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Russavia ^{I'm chanting as we speak} 18:01, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, SublimeWik. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:01, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why not send those “evidence” to arbcom.

Idk if you are aware the guy you are talking about is banned here. MartianTechnician (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The "guy I am talking about" is (link redacted) who is not just posting here but specifically targeting pages and discussions that relate to me (as part of his long-standing harassment campaign against me).

Just as a PSA for readers. (Your profile says you are Plutocow, i.e. part of the RationalWiki brigade). SublimeWik (talk) 23:27, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a concern about on-wiki behavior by an editor here, post about it on Wikipedia. Linking to an offsite page is disruptive, as it prevents proper discussion and review of your concerns. You can post about it on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or contact ArbCom if you feel the information needs to be confidential (e.g., it would "out" an editor). — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:02, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AN

There is a thread on WP:Administrators Noticeboard/Incidents#Off-site harassment from Anatoly Karlin MartianTechnician (talk) 00:06, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

You have been blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges in relation to information which has been removed from Wikipedia's public records.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org.

Administrators: Information which has been oversighted was considered when this block was placed. Therefore the Oversight team or the Arbitration Committee must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing oversight blocks without permission from an oversighter risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

-- ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-enwikimedia.org).

Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.

-- Daniel (talk) 03:15, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]