User talk:TimeToFixThis

Nomination for speedy deletion of Ground News

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ground News requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ground News. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:12, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why was my article deleted? That was all my own work, what was wrong with it? TimeToFixThis | 🕒 22:32, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see why it was deleted now. I had no knowledge of the previous pages created. Do you know, is there a way to contest the previous decision or create a new discussion? I don't see why the page cannot exist in a way that does not violate Wikipedia's policies like WP:Promo for example. TimeToFixThis | 🕒 23:15, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can create the page via the AfC process, as to overturn the consensus that was established at the AfD. I also suggest speaking with the deleting admin, JBW, and maybe they can draftify or send the draft to your own userspace, so you can continue working on it there. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:15, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. TimeToFixThis | 🕒 03:00, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Carney infobox

Please *read* the infobox carefully before changing it again. What office is he assuming on March *14*? Prime Minister. He does not *become* prime minister designate on March 14 but that is what your changes state. He is actually *assuming* the office of PM tomorrow so the infobox is correct to state that. The infobox says "assuming office" of Prime Minister on March 14. Once he is sworn it will change to "assumed office" on March 14. Please stop changing the office in the infobox to PM-Designate because it is nonsensical to say he is assuming the office of PM-designate tomorrow.

Once he is sworn in change move Justin Trudeau to "predecessor" instead of "succeeding" and the infobox will then say Carney "assumed office" on March 14. Wellington Bay (talk) 15:35, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are mistaken. There is no incumbent banner because it is implied he is assuming office on the 14th. He is the Prime Minister-designate until he is sworn in as PM. If you put 24th Prime Minister of Canada it would mislead readers of the article who are not taking a closer look. He is the prime minister-designate, assuming office as prime minister on March 14th. This is how it has been done, so you can take it up with an RFC or read some past consensuses. TimeToFixThis | 🕒 21:59, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]