User talk:Timetorockknowlege

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Question on NOR rule. Timetorockknowlege (talk) 00:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't asked a question.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to understand how the NOR means that you can't do simple calculations for election results to showcase county flips. That's not original research, its simple subtraction between two margins that any reader could do for themselves. I'm referencing many of Binksternet's recent contributions on so many US election related results, removing a large amount of useful information. Timetorockknowlege (talk) 00:50, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your question does not require an administrator to address it. You can try the {{Help-me}} template or ask your question at the WP:Teahouse. This strikes me as a content dispute, which might be better resolved at the Talk page of one of the election articles where you were reverted by Binksternet.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:07, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought advice from an administrator would help to clarify what I might be misunderstanding in the way a regular user might not know. Also, I'm not concerned about my edits specifically as much as the over 100 or so edits from yesterday on a bunch of other election articles. Timetorockknowlege (talk) 01:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trump coalition (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read "What Wikipedia is not" for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No major differences since the last submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trump coalition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 22:41, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Timetorockknowlege! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CoconutOctopus talk 22:41, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content on article

Hi, you made this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Department_of_Government_Efficiency&diff=prev&oldid=1276465757

With the edit summary: "Removed inappropriate and misleading comment"

But that was sourced, and now more thoroughly sourced: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Department_of_Government_Efficiency&diff=1276469062&oldid=1276466825

There are a wide array of WP:RS that make this verifiable, as seen here: https://www.google.com/search?q=Edward+Coristine+%2B%22tesla.sexy%22

Are you contesting what multiple sources are saying? What was misleading? -- Very Polite Person (talk) 00:55, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No sorry its that without the source I thought it was an act of vandalism thinking it said he was sexy and the owner of Tesla rather than what the source actually said. Apologies!

Timetorockknowlege (talk) 01:02, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All good! -- Very Polite Person (talk) 01:04, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to ', a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:09, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of United Nations General Assembly Resolution ES-11/7

Thank you for your interest in the Russo-Ukrainian War. Due to past disruption, a special set of rules apply to anyone editing in this topic area. Specifically, only extended confirmed editors are allowed to make direct edits and page creations to this topic area. Since you currently do not meet the requirements to contribute to this topic area, the page you created has been nominated for speedy deletion under G5.

If you think this page does not fall under the general sanctions described, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally you may wish to read about the topic restrictions here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:09, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]