User talk:TylerBurden
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Your request
[edit]I just don't have the time or energy right now, I suggest go to ANI. Doug Weller talk 13:36, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Don't worry about it. --TylerBurden (talk) 19:18, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2025).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Technical news
- Administrators can now nuke pages created by a user or IP address from the last 90 days, up from the initial 30 days. T380846
- A '
Recreated' tag will now be added to pages that were created with the same title as a page which was previously deleted and it can be used as a filter in Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages. T56145
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Palestine-Israel articles 5 has been closed.
Religion and Ethnicity. I think I understand what you mean
[edit]Hi @TylerBurden! I know we have gone over this topic a lot, but when you removed Religion from the InfoEthnicBox, saying "What is the point of including this here?" I thought you meant that Religion information is Irrelevant to an ethnicity. But what I now think you meant was, "Let's have religion information somewhere else in the article rather than the infobox", am I right, or at least do I have the right idea? Servite et contribuere (talk) 01:10, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Servite et contribuere Basically, yes, since there is usually more nuance to an ethnicity and religion than can be summed up in a few words, a location like a section on religion is more appropriate. --TylerBurden (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Sources and their places in a text
[edit]If a fact is sourced, the source is put in a note ending the sentence. If there is another source for some other fact, this should not be put in a parenthesis in the other sentence, but should better be put in a new sentence after the other sentence. That is what I have done in the article on suecophile. If you revert it again, you are violating the rules of academic sourcing, which is not what an encyclopedia should do. Your way of arranging the text is not good for the credibility of Wikipedia. Tara M. Lee (talk) 06:11, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Norwegian Canadians
[edit]Hi @TylerBurden,
Just wanted to clarify that the Norwegian Canadians map wasn't actually original research. I've updated the file to include a source, which is the 2021 Canadian Census; I can see how it came across as OR. Thanks for your vigilance.